- From: Abílio Neto <abilio.vaz.neto@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:33:35 +0100
- To: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com>
- Cc: "schema. org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+tziq3dWA+McHzK_cxvpYmC687ARK9dPa6YZmYS2Zcx-7Yd0w@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Martynas, You're correct when thinking that only the types listed in Google's Search Gallery <https://developers.google.com/search/docs/guides/search-gallery> are supported with Google's Rich Results Test <https://search.google.com/test/rich-results>. However, you can test your schema with Google's Structured Data Testing tool <https://search.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool/u/0/> to test for schema that does not produce rich results at the present time. If you insert your code in this tool, you'll notice there are 5 errors and 4 warnings. Please let me know if there's any other way I can help. Best regards, Bill Neto https://www.linkedin.com/in/billneto/ On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 1:19 PM Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph..com> wrote: > Hi, > > Am I right to assume that only types listed in the search gallery are > supported by the Rich Results test tool? > https://developers.google.com/search/docs/guides/search-gallery > https://search.google.com/test/rich-results > > If I put the following snippet into the test tool, it says "Page is > eligible for rich results". > However if I change the @type to http://schema.org/WebPage, I get > "Page not eligible for rich results known by this test". > > Is this documented somewhere? > > <script type="application/ld+json"> > [{ > "@context": { > "j.0": "http://schema.org/", > "title": { > "@id": "j.0:name" > } > }, > "@id": "https://localhost:4443/", > "@type": "http://schema.org/Article", > "title": "Root" > }] > </script> > > > Martynas > atomgraph.com > >
Received on Thursday, 8 April 2021 20:53:32 UTC