- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 11:23:17 +0200
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com>, "schema. org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhLHr7Wa0SoqNStgs9SWwDDYr0S0uPYyT73ACGrVfp29qQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 11:12, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 09:00, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 23:48, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Our Linked Data client is failing to load term descriptions from >>> schema.org because it looks like RDF representations are not served, >>> or at least the content negotiation does not work and HTML is >>> returned? >>> >>> Example: >>> curl https://schema.org/employee -H "Accept: >>> >>> application/rdf+xml,application/n-triples,application/rdf+thrift,text/turtle,text/rdf+n3,application/rdf+json" >>> >>> Executable example: https://reqbin.com/c-vjs20ras >> >> >> From my experience the content negotiation pattern that you are using is >> quite hard to implement >> >> Another simpler option might be to just put it in JSON-LD in a script tag >> ie a structured data island >> >> That might be the "schema.org" way of doing things ie eating your own >> dogfood, and I think is part of the JSON-LD 1.1 spec, so would play well >> with toolilng >> > > We don't use content negotiation to serve up per-page fragments of the RDF > representation of Schema.org. The site is statically served. > > You can get the whole thing from https://schema.org/docs/developers.html > in a variety of downloadable formats. We have for some years included a few > RDFa annotations in the HTML of each page, including > https://schema.org/employee but will be migrating these to JSON-LD > islands for maintainability, and for consistency with the ways schema.org > markup itself is most widely used. > > The current HTML has: <div id="mainContent" vocab="http://schema.org/" > typeof="rdfs:Property" resource="http://schema.org/employee"> > > which seems to extract ok, > https://www.w3.org/2012/pyRdfa/extract?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fschema.org%2Femployee&format=nt&rdfagraph=output&vocab_expansion=false&rdfa_lite=false&embedded_rdf=true&space_preserve=true&vocab_cache=true&vocab_cache_report=false&vocab_cache_refresh=false > > ...however this is fragile and makes it hard to improve the site's UI > without breaking the RDFa. There's a draft of the next release at > https://webschemas.org/employee which has embedded JSON-LD at the end of > the page content. > { "@context": { "rdf": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#", "rdfs": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#", "schema": "http://schema.org/", "xsd": "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" }, "@id": "schema:employee", "@type": "rdf:Property", "rdfs:comment": "Someone working for this organization.", "rdfs:label": "employee", "schema:domainIncludes": { "@id": "schema:Organization" }, "schema:rangeIncludes": { "@id": "schema:Person" } } LOVE this! > > cheers, > > Dan > > > >> >> > >>> >>> >>> Martynas >>> atomgraph.com >>> >>>
Received on Thursday, 15 October 2020 09:23:44 UTC