- From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 16:52:48 +0100
- To: Bill Kasdorf <kasdorf.bill@gmail.com>
- Cc: Hugh Paterson III <sil.linguist@gmail.com>, public-schemaorg@w3c.org
- Message-ID: <CAD47Kz5r34LRJFWrbmx5gbdggeZ0ZEE3ZYcKZEgrhM6deOdhMw@mail.gmail.com>
Are there different acronym conventions to identify the differing types (that could be used for a propertyID value) or are they both 'doi' ? ~Richard Richard Wallis Founder, Data Liberate http://dataliberate.com Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis Twitter: @rjw On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 16:47, Bill Kasdorf <kasdorf.bill@gmail.com> wrote: > And just to be clear, articles are identified with a Crossref DOI and data > sets are identified with a DataCite DOI. Two separate but related systems. > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 11:11 AM Richard Wallis < > richard.wallis@dataliberate.com> wrote: > >> As with all Schema.org types ScholarlyArticle >> <https://schema.org/ScholarlyArticle> can have an associated identifier >> <https://schema.org/identifier> property defined. >> >> For example: >> >> { >> "@context": "http://schema.org", >> "@type": "Article", >> "name": "DOI Handbook", >> "identifier": { >> "@type": "PropertyValue", >> "propertyID": "doi", >> "value": "10.1000/182" >> } >> } >> >> >> >> >> Richard Wallis >> Founder, Data Liberate >> http://dataliberate.com >> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis >> Twitter: @rjw >> >> >> >> On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 15:36, Hugh Paterson III <sil.linguist@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Greetings, >>> >>> I'm wondering why there is no DOI "attribute" listed under >>> scholarlyArticle. DOI resolvers are fairly important and mainstream, with >>> the Datacite API one can generally get the publication metadata of most >>> currently published articles. >>> >>> It seems that editEIDR solves the same kind of identification function, >>> so it seems that someone has suggested that this kind of functionality is >>> useful (which I agree it is). I'm wondering if there is any discussion for >>> adding DOI or abstracting to an "attribute" which would allow for the use >>> of Handles, URN's ARK's, DOI's, LSIDs etc. >>> >>> Otherwise, how are people choosing to encode DOI's? >>> >>> all the best, >>> - Hugh >>> >>> >>> for specifics on terms: >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifier >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archival_Resource_Key >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LSID >>> >>> >>> > > -- > *Bill Kasdorf* > *Principal, Kasdorf & Associates, LLC* > *Founding Partner, Publishing Technology Partners > <https://pubtechpartners.com/>* > *W3C Global Publishing Evangelist* > kasdorf.bill@gmail.com > +1 734-904-6252 > > ISNI: http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786 > ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786 > <https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786?lang=en> > >
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2020 15:53:14 UTC