W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > June 2020

Re: scholarlyArticle no DOI

From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 16:52:48 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD47Kz5r34LRJFWrbmx5gbdggeZ0ZEE3ZYcKZEgrhM6deOdhMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bill Kasdorf <kasdorf.bill@gmail.com>
Cc: Hugh Paterson III <sil.linguist@gmail.com>, public-schemaorg@w3c.org
Are there different acronym conventions to identify the differing types
(that could be used for a propertyID value) or are they both 'doi' ?

~Richard

Richard Wallis
Founder, Data Liberate
http://dataliberate.com
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
Twitter: @rjw



On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 16:47, Bill Kasdorf <kasdorf.bill@gmail.com> wrote:

> And just to be clear, articles are identified with a Crossref DOI and data
> sets are identified with a DataCite DOI. Two separate but related systems.
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 11:11 AM Richard Wallis <
> richard.wallis@dataliberate.com> wrote:
>
>> As with all Schema.org types ScholarlyArticle
>> <https://schema.org/ScholarlyArticle> can have an associated identifier
>> <https://schema.org/identifier> property defined.
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> {
>>    "@context": "http://schema.org",
>>    "@type": "Article",
>>    "name": "DOI Handbook",
>>    "identifier": {
>>        "@type": "PropertyValue",
>>        "propertyID": "doi",
>>        "value": "10.1000/182"
>>    }
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Richard Wallis
>> Founder, Data Liberate
>> http://dataliberate.com
>> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
>> Twitter: @rjw
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 15:36, Hugh Paterson III <sil.linguist@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> I'm wondering why there is no DOI "attribute" listed under
>>> scholarlyArticle. DOI resolvers are fairly important and mainstream, with
>>> the Datacite API one can generally get the publication metadata of most
>>> currently published articles.
>>>
>>> It seems that editEIDR  solves the same kind of identification function,
>>> so it seems that someone has suggested that this kind of functionality is
>>> useful (which I agree it is). I'm wondering if there is any discussion for
>>> adding DOI or abstracting to an "attribute" which would allow for the use
>>> of Handles, URN's ARK's, DOI's, LSIDs etc.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, how are people choosing to encode DOI's?
>>>
>>> all the best,
>>> - Hugh
>>>
>>>
>>> for specifics on terms:
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_object_identifier
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archival_Resource_Key
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LSID
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> *Bill Kasdorf*
> *Principal, Kasdorf & Associates, LLC*
> *Founding Partner, Publishing Technology Partners
> <https://pubtechpartners.com/>*
> *W3C Global Publishing Evangelist*
> kasdorf.bill@gmail.com
> +1 734-904-6252
>
> ISNI: http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786
> ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786
> <https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786?lang=en>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2020 15:53:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 11 June 2020 15:53:15 UTC