Re: Graph sintax

Hi Ghaulser,

Although that is an excellent question, it isn’t really one that the folks on this list probably worry about much.  I suggest you have a look at the json-ld specification here <https://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#named-graphs>. In short, people use @graph when they need named graphs or when they are presenting data that doesn’t roll up into a single root.

Hope that helps,
Adam



> On Sep 10, 2019, at 3:29 AM, Ghaulser Rigoti <ghaulserigoti@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> What is the difference between using the graph syntax instead using the classic one in the json ld? Doest it have some advantages?
> 
> Classic
> [
>   {
>     "@context": "http://schema.org <http://schema.org/>",
>     "@type": "WebSite",
>     ...
>   },
>   {
>     "@context": "http://schema.org <http://schema.org/>",
>     "@type": "Article",
>     ...
>   }
> ]
> 
> 
> Graph
> {
> "@context": "https://schema.org <https://schema.org/>",
>     "@graph": [
>         {
>             "@type": "WebSite",
>             ...
>         },
>         {
>             "@type": "WebPage",
>             ...
>         }
>     ]
> }
> 
> Greetings