- From: Marc <twamarc@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 15:15:35 +0100
- To: paoladimaio10@googlemail.com
- Cc: Nolan Nichols <nichols.nolan@gene.com>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAu2OTXU4zNEjN4BsDe_sWsTudPGPrVCR3GYeHMpr0kkrrDpzg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Nolan, Hi all, Nice raising topic here.... I support this from the beginning, ... in the past there was a idea in this sense but not enough community support and no clear support from clinicaltrial.gov If now we have a real interest and use cases.... please take a lead and we will organize a discussion through https://www.w3.org/community/schemed/ Regards, Best regards Marc Twagirumukiza ~ScheMed W3C Group Le dim. 24 mars 2019 à 11:20, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> a écrit : > Dear Nolan > Thanks for sharing. I am working on Research Protocols, and feel the same > I wonder if you would consider a research protocol ( biomed research > protocol, but there I wonder if we should generalize ) a similar enough > case to a clinical trial and should we join forces, or > not . Let me know what you think > PDM > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 8:57 AM Nolan Nichols <nichols.nolan@gene.com> > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I've started looking into creating a schema of clinical trial metadata >> using schema.org and mapping instances from public repositories (e.g., >> clinicaltrials.gov), to a clinical trial schema that could then be >> published to datacommons.org. >> >> From what I see, it looks like a good starting point would be to build on >> what has already been defined in the health-lifesci group with >> schema.org:MedicalTrial <https://health-lifesci.schema.org/MedicalTrial> >> . >> >> There are a handful of attempts at doing something similar elsewhere, >> such as: >> >> - Wikidata ClinicalTrial >> <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Medicine/Data_models/Trials> >> - Clinical Trial Data as RDF >> <https://github.com/phuse-org/CTDasRDF/blob/master/doc/HandsOnCreateTriplesFromOWL.md#more-ts-mapping> >> >> - Open Trials <https://opentrials.net/> >> - Linked CT <http://linkedct.org/> - broken ;-( >> >> While those efforts capture semantics, others provide a pretty clean >> tabular representation of clinical trial metadata like the AACT database >> <https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/>. >> >> I'd love to start a conversation about how we can create a schema for >> clinical trials that fits into the schema.org vision and can publish >> useful information like what is in the AACT database as linked data. >> >> I took the humble approach of defining a few terms that would extend the >> schema of datacommons.org to capture just a single attribute of a trial >> (i.e., phase). I submitted this as a PR >> <https://github.com/google/datacommons/pull/41>. >> >> I would love to get feedback on how I can move this idea forward and work >> with this community to define a schema that could be used to publish >> information about clinical trials. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Nolan >> >> -- >> Nolan Nichols, PhD >> Bioinformatics & Computational Biology >> Genentech, Inc. >> nichols.nolan@gene.com >> https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1099-3328 >> >>
Received on Sunday, 24 March 2019 14:16:33 UTC