- From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 10:02:16 +0100
- To: Christian Kosmowski <ksmwsk@gmail.com>
- Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAD47Kz5sr7nL0cNq-QBbMwuTvtbT2mwzDsaO8w1cvYg3=9LGWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Christian, I think you will find that the current structure is capable of representing what you describe, using the Offer <http://schema.org/Offer> type. This enables the representation of multiple offers to supply a something, each with their own specific properties (price, validity period, eligibility criteria, etc.). This can be modelled in a couple of ways. Either from the point of view of the offering organisation with multiple values for the makesOffer property, in which case the itemOffered property, of Offer, would reference a description of the entry to the venue (using the Service or Product Type); or with multiple [Offer] values for the offers property of such a description, where the offeredBy property would reference the organisation; or both. Check out some of the examples <https://schema.org/Offer#examples> for Offer for some indications on how this might be achieved. ~Richard. Richard Wallis Founder, Data Liberate http://dataliberate.com Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis Twitter: @rjw On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 09:37, Christian Kosmowski <ksmwsk@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi there, > > I am searching for a way to represent admission charges for all types of > different venues (public parcs, pools, theme parks etc..). > > I found this to be a rather complex topic since there are so many > different rules that can apply (prices depending on age, disability, group > prices, cards, memberships and so on...). > > I'd like to find a way in representing these admission charges in a way > that is completely machine readable so that i can find a concrete price for > a person or a group of persons if i provide all relevant information. > > My first question is: can you think of a way to represent something like > this with the existing schema.org vocabulary. > > Second: Do you thinkl, that this is interesting for enough people to be > added to the standard? If yes, what would be the correct way to propose > schema.org schemas for this? > > Thanks, > > Christian >
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2019 09:02:50 UTC