Yeah, this sounds plausible as a modelinf idiom. As ever I'd suggest - in the absence of other guidance - to lean towards the laziest option. Schema.org was fundamentally intended to be *easy* for publishers. If some consuming app asks for gift aspects to be explicitly modelled, that would be a good reason to put more time into breaking out those details... Dan On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, 11:46 Michael Andrews <nextcontent01@gmail.com wrote: > +1 for Richard's suggestion regarding using addOn. That makes sense, and > could cover a range of scenarios. > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 4:59 PM Richard Wallis < > richard.wallis@dataliberate.com> wrote: > >> Thinking about it a little further... >> >> Potentially the Offer <https://schema.org/Offer> describing the 'gift' >> could be be an addOn <https://schema.org/addOn> to an offer to purchase. >> >> ~Richard. >> Richard Wallis >> Founder, Data Liberate >> http://dataliberate.com >> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis >> Twitter: @rjw >> >> >> >> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 11:17, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, 10:43 Bebemovil <info@bebemovil.com wrote: >>> >>>> Hi friends. >>>> >>>> We are a baby online shop and we have offers with gifts included. >>>> >>>> We have not encountered a gift property to indicates to google that our >>>> offer includes a gift for buyer totally free. >>>> >>>> How can we do it? to google serp shows rich snippets of gifts >>>> >>> >>> We haven't really gone into that level of detail. For now, it would be >>> simplest to just summarize any "gift" aspects of an offer within its >>> textual description. >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>
Received on Monday, 7 January 2019 12:24:30 UTC