- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 09:52:31 -0700
- To: Nicolas Torzec <torzecn@verizonmedia.com>
- Cc: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>, umutcan.simsek@sti2.at, Thejas Prasad <thejchess@gmail.com>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAK-qy=6GrmJhPzw6sN9yaJ4SatPn3tjRk2qHmFzF1D_0TERtFw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 13 Apr 2019, 02:11 Nicolas Torzec, <torzecn@verizonmedia.com> wrote: > The "schemaorg.owl" file that Richard pointed out can be loaded into > Protégé. > > But note that all schema.org properties will be seen as object properties > in Protégé. Schema.org (RDF in general) doesn't distinguish between > datatype properties and object properties. Schema.org datatypes (e.g. > Boolean, Number, Text, etc.) are just RDFs classes and, because all > schema.org properties have Text and URL in their range implicitly by > default, they all become object properties during the OWL conversion > process. > "because all schema.org properties have Text and URL in their range implicitly by default" I don't believe we quite say that... Dan -N. > > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 1:17 PM Richard Wallis < > richard.wallis@dataliberate.com> wrote: > >> Hi Thejas, >> >> If you use https://schema.org/docs/schemaorg.owl you will find the >> domain & range values that are understood by Protégé. >> >> Checkout https://schema.org/docs/developers.html#experiments for >> details. >> >> ~Richard. >> Richard Wallis >> Founder, Data Liberate >> http://dataliberate.com >> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis >> Twitter: @rjw >> >> >> >> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 20:23, Umutcan Simsek <umutcan.simsek@sti2.at> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> The range and domain properties of schema.org are not supported by >>> protégé. You need to replace does with rdfs:domain and rdfs:range in the >>> schema file you are trying to import. Although this would be probably >>> enough for protégé to load the schema.org properly, you would still >>> need to work on the property definitions to make distinction between >>> datatype and object properties. >>> >>> Alternatively, you can try the experimental owl mapping, >>> https://schema.org/docs/datamodel.html. >>> I am not sure if this one is up to date. >>> >>> Greetings >>> Umut >>> >>> Sent from mobile >>> >>> On Apr 11, 2019 19:20, Thejas Prasad <thejchess@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I had a quick question on how to import the ontology from schema.org >>> into protege. I am able to import the ontology, however, the object >>> properties are not imported. I was hoping someone from this list could >>> provide into how to import the ontology. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Thejas >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. >>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com >>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> >>> On Apr 11, 2019 19:20, Thejas Prasad <thejchess@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I had a quick question on how to import the ontology from schema.org >>> into protege. I am able to import the ontology, however, the object >>> properties are not imported. I was hoping someone from this list could >>> provide into how to import the ontology. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Thejas >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. >>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com >>> ______________________________________________________________________ >>> >>> >>>
Received on Saturday, 13 April 2019 16:53:09 UTC