W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > March 2018

Re: Schema for Facts

From: esteves <esteves@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:24:32 +0200
Message-Id: <9109E8DB-8067-4563-919C-81ED9FB67874@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
Cc: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, Gaurav Verma <info@redrockdigimark.com>, "schema. org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
To: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com>
I am not completely sure what you want Gaurav, since it depends on the perspective. 
In my understanding, it seems to be more like an ontology to represent facts in terms of a fact-checking perspective? So you have a claim c (s="water", p="boiling point”, o=“100”), which has some evidence object (which is a set of proofs which argue in favour or against c) plus some further metadata and final indicator to classify c (in this case something like score =>0.9~1 hopefully)

So it’s like smt which comprehends fact-checking, argumentation mining and credibility factors. I am not aware of an official ontology for that though. If so, you may be interested in have a look here: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2852495 <https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2852495> More specifically, the attached image, which is an RDF-based vocabulary to express such information. We did not publish the ontology itself and it could be improved. But definitely should be a good starting point. 



Best regards,
Esteves.

> On 28. Mar 2018, at 15:02, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com> wrote:
> 
> Sounds also a lot like what Cyc was doing: http://www.cyc.com/opencyc/ <http://www.cyc.com/opencyc/>
> 
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com <mailto:thadguidry@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Your example of "water", "boiling point", and "100" "celsius" could be expressed with RDF Triples <http://blog.swirrl.com/articles/introduction-to-rdf/>
> 
> A super simple example, is to capture facts with RDF statements and using the Turtle format <https://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/> to capture those statements:
>  
> Subject, Predicate, Object
> <http://example.org/#water <http://example.org/#water>> <http://example.org/#boiling+point <http://example.org/#boiling+point>> <http://example.org/#100C <http://example.org/#100C>> .
>  
> And good luck competing with https://www.wolframalpha.com/ <https://www.wolframalpha.com/> :)
> -Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://plus.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:14 AM Gaurav Verma <info@redrockdigimark.com <mailto:info@redrockdigimark.com>> wrote:
> Hi All,
> I`m working on implementing Schema markup for our upcoming website which focuses on FACTS: historical facts, geographical facts, science, maths, language etc. Our aim is to provide a hub for information (like Wikipedia), but geared more towards representing information in very simple terms for use by AI: so that AI bots can use the schema and understand the data.
> 
> For example, a fact of water is that it boils at 100 degree celsius. In what schema may I represent the information of "water", "boiling point" and "100" "celsius"?
> 
> Can you please recommend what can I use for markup for such information?
> 
> Gaurav V
> 
> 


Screenshot_2018-03-28_15.18.54.png
(image/png attachment: Screenshot_2018-03-28_15.18.54.png)

Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2018 13:28:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:12:38 UTC