- From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:58:53 +0000
- To: <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>, <anthony.moretti@gmail.com>
- CC: <allison.muri@usask.ca>, <roger@ecstatic.com>, <thadguidry@gmail.com>, <vtardif@google.com>, <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <2f3d288260e24898b8eed875d6566016@exch1-mel.nexus.csiro.au>
As mentioned in my earlier mail, the best _theory_ (from Allen) does not distinguish between instants and intervals – recognising that if your clock is good enough even things that look instantaneous do have a finite duration. So things which the vernacular calls ‘period’ and things known as ‘events’ are on a continuum. I’m also pretty catholic in my view of ‘notableness’ – if it is notable enough for someone to give it a name, then that’s enough. I’m aware that schema.org is not theory-based, but theory can sometimes clarify. Simon From: Richard Wallis [mailto:richard.wallis@dataliberate.com] Sent: Wednesday, 20 June, 2018 09:11 To: Anthony Moretti <anthony.moretti@gmail.com> Cc: Muri, Allison <allison.muri@usask.ca>; roger@ecstatic.com; Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>; Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>; Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>; schema.org Mailing List <public-schemaorg@w3.org> Subject: Re: Historical events Anthony, I’m not following your logic here. I don’t see a Period (of time from a start time/date to an end date/time) as an event. ~Richard. Richard Wallis Founder, Data Liberate http://dataliberate.com Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis Twitter: @rjw On 20 June 2018 at 00:05, Anthony Moretti <anthony.moretti@gmail.com<mailto:anthony.moretti@gmail.com>> wrote: That definitely works, but only if some definition of Period was agreed on. The property periodEventOccurred would be a subproperty of superEvent in any case: superEvent periodEventOccurred So you could describe the same information using the existing term right? The Black Death superEvent: The Middle Ages Anthony On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:50 PM Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com<mailto:richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>> wrote: Using a Period Type I would suggest a cleaner alternative way of saying an event occurred during a period would be like this: { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "Event", "name": "The Black Death", "Description": "A pandemic that spread throughout Europe", "periodEventOccured": { "@type": "Period", "name": "The Middle Ages", "approximateStartDate": "400AD", "approximateEndDate":"1500AD" } } On 19 June 2018 at 23:41, Anthony Moretti <anthony.moretti@gmail.com<mailto:anthony.moretti@gmail.com>> wrote: I was referencing the development version of Schema, I should probably reference production, sorry Roger: * https://schema.org/subEvent * https://schema.org/superEvent To say some event happened during the Iron Age for example: Invention of iron plow superEvent: Iron Age Anthony On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:05 PM Muri, Allison <allison.muri@usask.ca<mailto:allison.muri@usask.ca>> wrote: The google Cloud host is really slow and I think the 404 is a result of something loading too slowly. I could probably publish this more reliably on my own website! I generally just wait a bit and reload the page. Sorry about that. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 19, 2018, at 3:58 PM, Roger Rohrbach <roger@ecstatic.com<mailto:roger@ecstatic.com>> wrote: I get 404 Not Found for both of those pages. On Jun 19, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Anthony Moretti <anthony.moretti@gmail.com<mailto:anthony.moretti@gmail.com>> wrote: Isn't it already modeled by these properties?: * https://webschemas.org/subEvent * https://webschemas.org/superEvent Events can exist in part-whole hierarchies, aren't named periods just events high in these hierarchies? Anthony
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2018 23:59:27 UTC