- From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:58:53 +0000
- To: <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>, <anthony.moretti@gmail.com>
- CC: <allison.muri@usask.ca>, <roger@ecstatic.com>, <thadguidry@gmail.com>, <vtardif@google.com>, <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <2f3d288260e24898b8eed875d6566016@exch1-mel.nexus.csiro.au>
As mentioned in my earlier mail, the best _theory_ (from Allen) does not distinguish between instants and intervals – recognising that if your clock is good enough even things that look instantaneous do have a finite duration. So things which the vernacular calls ‘period’ and things known as ‘events’ are on a continuum. I’m also pretty catholic in my view of ‘notableness’ – if it is notable enough for someone to give it a name, then that’s enough.
I’m aware that schema.org is not theory-based, but theory can sometimes clarify.
Simon
From: Richard Wallis [mailto:richard.wallis@dataliberate.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 20 June, 2018 09:11
To: Anthony Moretti <anthony.moretti@gmail.com>
Cc: Muri, Allison <allison.muri@usask.ca>; roger@ecstatic.com; Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>; Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>; Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>; schema.org Mailing List <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Historical events
Anthony,
I’m not following your logic here. I don’t see a Period (of time from a start time/date to an end date/time) as an event.
~Richard.
Richard Wallis
Founder, Data Liberate
http://dataliberate.com
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
Twitter: @rjw
On 20 June 2018 at 00:05, Anthony Moretti <anthony.moretti@gmail.com<mailto:anthony.moretti@gmail.com>> wrote:
That definitely works, but only if some definition of Period was agreed on.
The property periodEventOccurred would be a subproperty of superEvent in any case:
superEvent
periodEventOccurred
So you could describe the same information using the existing term right?
The Black Death
superEvent: The Middle Ages
Anthony
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:50 PM Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com<mailto:richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>> wrote:
Using a Period Type I would suggest a cleaner alternative way of saying an event occurred during a period would be like this:
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "Event",
"name": "The Black Death",
"Description": "A pandemic that spread throughout Europe",
"periodEventOccured": {
"@type": "Period",
"name": "The Middle Ages",
"approximateStartDate": "400AD",
"approximateEndDate":"1500AD"
}
}
On 19 June 2018 at 23:41, Anthony Moretti <anthony.moretti@gmail.com<mailto:anthony.moretti@gmail.com>> wrote:
I was referencing the development version of Schema, I should probably reference production, sorry Roger:
* https://schema.org/subEvent
* https://schema.org/superEvent
To say some event happened during the Iron Age for example:
Invention of iron plow
superEvent: Iron Age
Anthony
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 3:05 PM Muri, Allison <allison.muri@usask.ca<mailto:allison.muri@usask.ca>> wrote:
The google Cloud host is really slow and I think the 404 is a result of something loading too slowly. I could probably publish this more reliably on my own website! I generally just wait a bit and reload the page. Sorry about that.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 19, 2018, at 3:58 PM, Roger Rohrbach <roger@ecstatic.com<mailto:roger@ecstatic.com>> wrote:
I get 404 Not Found for both of those pages.
On Jun 19, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Anthony Moretti <anthony.moretti@gmail.com<mailto:anthony.moretti@gmail.com>> wrote:
Isn't it already modeled by these properties?:
* https://webschemas.org/subEvent
* https://webschemas.org/superEvent
Events can exist in part-whole hierarchies, aren't named periods just events high in these hierarchies?
Anthony
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2018 23:59:27 UTC