Re: Discussion topic: How to improve understanding and application of schema.org

Sounds Great Michael !  And thanks for sticking with us and helping improve
users understanding...its a long term effort, I know, but we are all in
this together and just having these notes from you helps understand areas
we need to improve.

Looking forward to our Slack conversations with you and the community !
(it'll probably blow up on the first day! lololol)
-Thad

On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:23 PM Michael Andrews <nextcontent01@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I’ve jotted down a number of questions I have about schema.org, based on
> reading existing documentation.  They involve too much detail to discuss
> in an email thread, so I will save them for the Slack channel when it is
> operational.
>
>
> However, I will preview some of the themes in my questions.
>
>
> * Which to use (when two entities or properties seem similar)
>
> * When to use (especially for intangible entities)
>
> * How to use (especially for intangible entities)
>
> * Clarifying the intention of an entity (when the definition is not
> completely aligned with properties)
>
> * Cases of terminology that can be misunderstood
>
> * Cases of unclear definitions
>
> * Inheritance in entities, and in properties, and clarifying whether
> different statements are equivalent or not
>
> * Cases of low adoption of seemingly widely applicable terms
>
> * Scope disambiguation of conceptually related terms
>
> * Clarifying intended use of Action entities
>
> * Guidance on preferred course of action when schema.org does not cover
> specific entity or property needed
>
>
>