- From: Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 23:47:47 +0200
- To: elf-pavlik@hackers4peace.net
- Cc: public-schemaorg@w3.org, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Not sure I understand what you want to say in here. > http://schema.org/model is the relationship type / property for materializing the link between a product and its product model. So clearly, this relationship type is a property, not a class / entity type. But the original discussion was referring to schema:ProductModel, which is the class / entity type. Martin ----------------------------------- martin hepp http://www.heppnetz.de mhepp@computer.org @mfhepp > On 14 Jun 2018, at 19:03, elf-pavlik@hackers4peace.net wrote: > > On 2018-06-14 07:46, Thad Guidry wrote: >> Hi Martin ! >> "no, ProductModel is not an attribute, it is a class in its own >> right." >> Yes, that's what our current modeling simplifies to since it borrowed >> the top level from RDF. >> And that's where you have your opinion and others politely disagree >> and have their own opinion, that Model is an attribute or trait of the >> type Product. But that is fine ! We have dealt with it and things >> are published now. No worries! > > http://schema.org/model > > "The model of the product. Use with the URL of a ProductModel or a textual representation of the model identifier. The URL of the ProductModel can be from an external source. It is recommended to additionally provide strong product identifiers via the gtin8/gtin13/gtin14 and mpn properties." > > Values expected to be one of these types: > ProductModel > Text > > Used on these types: > Product >
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2018 21:48:10 UTC