Re: Historical events

I haven't followed all the discussion, but as a source of inspiration, you
can have a look at the types defined in the CIDOC-CRM (
http://www.cidoc-crm.org/versions-of-the-cidoc-crm) for cultural heritage
descriptions :

   - E4 Period : http://www.cidoc-crm.org/Entity/e4-period/version-6.2
      - "This class comprises sets of coherent phenomena or cultural
      manifestations occurring in time and space. "
   - E5 Event (defined as a subclass of E4 Period) :
   http://www.cidoc-crm.org/Entity/e5-event/version-6.2
      - "This class comprises changes of states in cultural, social or
      physical systems, regardless of scale, brought about by a series or group
      of coherent physical, cultural, technological or legal phenomena. Such
      changes of state will affect instances of E77 Persistent Item or its
      subclasses.
      The distinction between an E5 Event and an E4 Period is partly a
      question of the scale of observation. Viewed at a coarse level of detail,
      an E5 Event is an ‘instantaneous’ change of state. At a fine
level, the E5
      Event can be analysed into its component phenomena within a
space and time
      frame, and as such can be seen as an E4 Period. The reverse is not
      necessarily the case: not all instances of E4 Period give rise to a
      noteworthy change of state."
   - E7 Activity : http://www.cidoc-crm.org/Entity/e7-activity/version-6.2
      - "This class comprises actions intentionally carried out by
      instances of E39 Actor that result in changes of state in the cultural,
      social, or physical systems documented.
      This notion includes complex, composite and long-lasting actions such
      as the building of a settlement or a war, as well as simple, short-lived
      actions such as the opening of a door."

I do not agree with the definition you give to Event; I think it is to
narrow; why should an Event be "scheduled or planned" ?

thomas


2018-06-14 6:16 GMT+02:00 Muri, Allison <allison.muri@usask.ca>:

> Hello, to all who have been commenting on this question. I have been
> following with great interest whenever I can.
>
> I have tried two different approaches for what I originally called
> historical events. I know I’ve got some things not quite right, but the
> links below offer preliminary sketches with just a couple examples. I’m
> leaning toward a new class, Occurrent, as the best solution, because it
> wouldn’t interfere with the current use of, and assumptions about, Event.
>
> To reiterate, I am not thinking that HistoricalEvent is the same as merely
> a past event. What I’m thinking about is something that would be of
> significant value to webmasters whose sites focus on history, cultural
> history, natural history, literary history, literature, diaries (e.g. the
> Diary of Anne Frank), news, political commentary, etc.
>
>
> https://sdo-occurrent.appspot.com separates Event and Occurrence into
> their own classes, as follows:
>
> *Event: *A planned or scheduled public, social, sporting, or commercial
> event happening at a certain time and location physical or virtual, such as
> a concert, lecture, meeting, or festival. Ticketing information may be
> added via the [[offers]] property. Repeated events may be structured as
> separate Event objects.
>
> *Occurrent:* A thing that occurs, happens, or takes place; an incident,
> especially one of significance.
>
>
> More specific types for Occurrent would include such things as:
>
> • ArmedConflict
> • DiseaseOutbreak
> • Election
> • Enthronement
> • HistoricalEvent
> • Invention
> • Investiture
> • NaturalEvent
> • PersonalEvent
> • PoliticalEvent
>
> I have examples here for Occurrent and HistoricalEvent.
>
>
> https://sdo-historicalevent.appspot.com includes HistoricalEvent as a
> subclass of Event.
>
> *Event:* An event happening at a certain time past or future and location
> physical or virtual, such as a concert, lecture, meeting, festival, or
> historical event. Ticketing information may be added via
> the [[offers]] property. Repeated events may be structured as separate
> Event objects.
>
>
> Here there would be a somewhat odd jumbled list of more specific types
> (the list of Properties from Event, which I haven’t started adding, would
> be confusingly long and wide ranging in this scenario):
>
> • ArmedConflict
> • BusinessEvent
> • ChildrensEvent
> • ComedyEvent
> • CourseInstance
> • DanceEvent
> • DeliveryEvent
> • DiseaseOutbreak
> • EducationEvent
> • Election
> • Enthronement
> • ExhibitionEvent
> • Festival
> • FoodEvent
> • HistoricalEvent
> • Invention
> • Investiture
> • LiteraryEvent
> • MusicEvent
> • NaturalEvent
> • PersonalEvent
> • PoliticalEvent
> • PublicationEvent
> • SaleEvent
> • ScreeningEvent
> • SocialEvent
> • SportsEvent
> • TheaterEvent
> • VisualArtsEvent
>
>
> I have the example here for HistoricalEvent.
>
> One last comment, I was looking at http://schema.org/Corporation for
> examples and thought it strange that the only example is for
> http://schema.org/Store. Maybe that’s purposeful, but I was wondering if
> there is an ommission there?
>
>
> Thoughts? Advice?
>
> - Allison
>
>
>
> On Jun 12, 2018, at 1:55 AM, Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think that it is problematic to have a subtype "HistoricEvent", because
> it will mean that the type for a object will depend on the temporal
> context. E.g., a day after a conference is over, it wil become a
> HistoricEvent.
>
> My feeling is that a lot of confusion stems from the fact that schema.org
> tries to avoid subclasses as long as they do not change the processing of
> respective entities by search engines. For instance, we do not need a
> subtype of places as long as all places are rendered the same way by Google
> et al.
>
> As a consequence, we attach properties that make sense only for some
> instances directly to the more abstract classes.
>
> This sounds unintuitive if you come from a knowledge engineering context,
> but it is actually so by design. A type in schema.org serves as a
> hookpoint for triggering / grouping computational operations over the data.
> If you have no algorithmic steps that require a certain distinction, then
> we do not have respective specializations of a type.
>
> Best
>
> Martin
>
>
> -----------------------------------
> martin hepp  http://www.heppnetz.de
> mhepp@computer.org          @mfhepp
>
>
>
>
> On 12 Jun 2018, at 09:08, Muri, Allison <allison.muri@usask.ca> wrote:
>
> Many, many thanks to those who have contributed to this interesting
> discussion. I am working on examples for two types: first, HistoricalEvent
> as a subtype of Event. The more I work through this as a possibility the
> more I wonder how usable it would be.  The second is Occurrent as a new
> type. This would have certain advantages and disadvantages, just as
> HistoricalEvent as would described above.
>
> I will add examples tomorrow and then hopefully generate a discussion
> about the value and applicability of http://schema.org/Event/
> HistoricalEvent as subclass of Event versus something
> ttp://schema.org/Event/Occurrent to distinguish between an event as is
> now used for mostly future events, and the following for anthying that is
> an occurrencw the past.
>
> More to come tomorrow.
>
> - Alliaon
>
>
> On Jun 4, 2018, at 5:11 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@pjjk.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> On 03/06/18 00:07, Muri, Allison wrote:
>
> Maybe this won’t generate much interest, but I have obtained my own fork
> of the Schema.org GitHub repository and also have set up a Google App
> Engine project to be share it publicly. I take Phil Barker’s point that one
> should “first make sure that schema.org is the best vocabulary for this
> type of information, e.g. by thinking about use cases that fall within the
> scope of its mission.” I really don’t know the answer to that. Hopefully I
> can generate more conversations about this in the future. Thank you, Phil,
> for the links to Richard Wallis’ blog posts and videos.
>
> You're welcome.
>
> This discussion has already lead to a suggested improvement in schema.org,
> so there is clearly some overlap between your interests and its scope. I
> like Richard's parallel to TouristAttraction.
>
> I think there are also issues around Periods, Events and historical
> reference points that could be unpicked.
>
> Regarding “they already know those differences,” I think search engines
> would not know that “Ætna groan” in the passage below refers to the 1669
> eruption of Mount Etna, a “NaturalEvent” (as opposed to a satiric reference
> to a really firey, angry queen at her coronation) without markup:
>
> Nor with more heavy strokes could Ætna groan,
> When Vulcan forg’d the Arms for Thetis’ Son.
>
> —Poems on Several Subjects, by Stephen Duck (1730)
>
>
> This is a good use case. This probably isn't the right forum to go into
> details of addressing it, but by way of illustrating a point ... [I think
> you mentioned microdata at one point]
> Nor with more heavy strokes could
>  <span itemprop="mentions" itemscope
>        itemtype="Event"
>        name="1669 eruption of Mount Etna">
>     Ætna groan
>     <link itemprop="sameas" href=
> "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2411998"
>
>
>     <meta itemprop="location" content="Mount Etna">
>     <meta itemprop="startDate" content="1669-03-08">
>  <span>,
>
> When Vulcan forg’d the Arms for Thetis’ Son
> Follow the sameas URL and you will see that I cheated, but adding the
> relevant eruption would be possible, and what I did link to illustrates how
> machine readable information can be provided beyond the schema.org
> markup. I have been minimal in my description of the event in the inline
> schema.org markup, there could be a lot more there if required/useful.
>
> Phil
>
> --
> Phil Barker. http://people.pjjk.net/phil
> PJJK Limited: technology to enhance learning; information systems for
> education.
> CETIS LLP: a cooperative consultancy for innovation in education
> technology.
>
> PJJK Limited is registered in Scotland as a private limited company,
> number SC569282.
> CETIS is a co-operative limited liability partnership, registered in
> England number OC399090
>
>
> ....................................................
> Allison Muri
> Department of English
>
> Arts 418
> University of Saskatchewan
> Saskatoon, SK, Canada
> ph: 306.966.5503
>
>
>
> ....................................................
> Allison Muri
> Department of English
>
> Arts 418
> University of Saskatchewan
> Saskatoon, SK, Canada
> ph: 306.966.5503
>
>


-- 

*Thomas Francart* -* SPARNA*
Web de *données* | Architecture de l'*information* | Accès aux
*connaissances*
blog : blog.sparna.fr, site : sparna.fr, linkedin :
fr.linkedin.com/in/thomasfrancart
tel :  +33 (0)6.71.11.25.97, skype : francartthomas