- From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 13:05:37 +0100
- To: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAD47Kz47aG=YnusZxp9BPSVVE7An_aQUn5-X-wCMbiBiJWYjhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Calling folks with more OWL experience than me!
The schema.org site has an OWL definition file that has not been maintained
since April 2014: http://schema.org/docs/schemaorg.owl. Also the structure
and syntax of the file needs some attention.
To help with the occasional questions about accessing processable
representations of the vocabulary; to attempt to close an issue (#1611
<https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1611>); and to help with a
personal project, I have had a look at producing an up to date, improved,
maintainable version of the file.
My first attempt can be downloaded/viewed here:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/rjwPublicData/public/schemaorg.owl
I am looking for comments, suggestions, and help around a few aspects of
this work in progress:
- Is it generally ‘a good owl file’
- Should it contain more/less info about the vocabulary and its terms
- Specifically with reference to domainIncludes and rangeInclude -
mapped to rdfs:domain & rdfs:range with owl:unionOf collections:
- Is this the best/only way to represent multiple domain & ranges for an
objectproperty?
- Have I got the syntax correct?
- Several people use Protégé <https://protege.stanford.edu/> as a
tool for this kind of effort - I am trying to identify what syntax, will
enable this tool to recognise the multiple domain/ranges when importing
this file.
If anyone out there with more OWL experience than me (not difficult), could
spend a few minutes taking a look at this and commenting, it would be
greatly appreciated.
~Richard
Richard Wallis
Founder, Data Liberate
http://dataliberate.com
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
Twitter: @rjw
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2018 12:06:16 UTC