Re: Schema for a Collection of Links?

>
> It's not the best place for such questions really.


Ok, then I propose adding an example for categorized collection of links in
the documentation,
because there are so many
<https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/98556/what-is-the-correct-way-to-use-the-collectionpage-type-for-a-category-page>,
many <https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/ChainingLayoutElements>, many
<https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12728766/html-schema-org-webpage-ispartof>
ways of doing this.

Sorry for disturbing,
Ilya.

On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 1:56 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 at 11:28, Ilya Petrov <ilyaigpetrov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for your reply, Richard.
>> Could you or someone please guide me how microdata markup should look
>> like, here is how I currently try to do it:
>>
>> <head>
>>     ...
>>     <script type="application/ld+json">
>>         {"description":"...","author":"...","@type":"CollectionPage","url":"...",...}
>> // This was generated by a static site generator.
>>     </script>
>> </head>
>> <body>
>>     <main>
>>         <a href="https://springfield-xxxx.us" itemtype="
>> https://schema.org/WebSite">Official site of Springfield</a>
>>         <a href="https://facebook.com/group/XXXX" itemtype="
>> https://schema.org/WebPage">Local events in Springfield</a>
>>         <a href="https://news.us/city/springfield-xxxx" itemtype="
>> https://schema.org/WebPage">Latest news in Springfield</a>
>>     </main>
>> </body>
>>
>> I use https://schema.org/WebPage instead of http://schema.org/WebPage
>> (httpS over http), I hope it's ok.
>> I also don't define CollectionPage on <main>, <body> or <html>, because
>> it's already defined in the JSON-LD script, I hope it's also ok.
>>
>> If this mail-list is not a place for such questions, please, let me know.
>>
>
> It's not the best place for such questions really. Not to be unfriendly
> but since there are literally millions of sites using Schema.org, we're not
> really set up here to deal with that scale of question-answering. You might
> try stack overflow or similar sites if people from here can't help you, but
> yeah best to move this kind of question offlist. There is also the larger
> matter that the markup might be broadly correct but not particularly
> useful. For example at Google, while it is true that we can treat lots of
> bits of schema.org as a kind of signal (helping us to understand the
> general content of your pages), we generally nudge people towards putting
> their time/effort primarily into markup associated with explicitly
> documented search features, i.e. https://developers.
> google.com/search/docs/guides/search-features . While this seems a
> reasonable way to use CollectionPage I'm not aware of any such features
> that would make great use of the markup currently.
>
> cheers,
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>> Thank you for your help,
>> Ilya.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:34 PM, Richard Wallis <
>> richard.wallis@dataliberate.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ilya,
>>>
>>> I would use CollectionPage <http://schema.org/CollectionPage>.  However
>>> I would describe each ‘link’ as a WebPage <http://schema.org/WebPage>
>>> or WebSite <http://schema.org/WebSite> with its *url* being the link.
>>>
>>> ~Richard.
>>>
>>> Richard Wallis
>>> Founder, Data Liberate
>>> http://dataliberate.com
>>> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
>>> Twitter: @rjw
>>>
>>> On 31 May 2018 at 09:55, Ilya Petrov <ilyaigpetrov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello.
>>>>
>>>> What is the best schema for a page <https://sukhoylog.github.io/sites>
>>>> that contains a categorized list of local sites/urls of my small town?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Ilya.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

Received on Sunday, 3 June 2018 06:27:15 UTC