- From: Ilya Petrov <ilyaigpetrov@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2018 11:24:43 +0500
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACADFSzU-iezyT1Vb8Ew9zXYtk-6PBGfjbQ1=TYevqu2HoJtAw@mail.gmail.com>
> > It's not the best place for such questions really. Ok, then I propose adding an example for categorized collection of links in the documentation, because there are so many <https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/98556/what-is-the-correct-way-to-use-the-collectionpage-type-for-a-category-page>, many <https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/ChainingLayoutElements>, many <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12728766/html-schema-org-webpage-ispartof> ways of doing this. Sorry for disturbing, Ilya. On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 1:56 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, 2 Jun 2018 at 11:28, Ilya Petrov <ilyaigpetrov@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thank you for your reply, Richard. >> Could you or someone please guide me how microdata markup should look >> like, here is how I currently try to do it: >> >> <head> >> ... >> <script type="application/ld+json"> >> {"description":"...","author":"...","@type":"CollectionPage","url":"...",...} >> // This was generated by a static site generator. >> </script> >> </head> >> <body> >> <main> >> <a href="https://springfield-xxxx.us" itemtype=" >> https://schema.org/WebSite">Official site of Springfield</a> >> <a href="https://facebook.com/group/XXXX" itemtype=" >> https://schema.org/WebPage">Local events in Springfield</a> >> <a href="https://news.us/city/springfield-xxxx" itemtype=" >> https://schema.org/WebPage">Latest news in Springfield</a> >> </main> >> </body> >> >> I use https://schema.org/WebPage instead of http://schema.org/WebPage >> (httpS over http), I hope it's ok. >> I also don't define CollectionPage on <main>, <body> or <html>, because >> it's already defined in the JSON-LD script, I hope it's also ok. >> >> If this mail-list is not a place for such questions, please, let me know. >> > > It's not the best place for such questions really. Not to be unfriendly > but since there are literally millions of sites using Schema.org, we're not > really set up here to deal with that scale of question-answering. You might > try stack overflow or similar sites if people from here can't help you, but > yeah best to move this kind of question offlist. There is also the larger > matter that the markup might be broadly correct but not particularly > useful. For example at Google, while it is true that we can treat lots of > bits of schema.org as a kind of signal (helping us to understand the > general content of your pages), we generally nudge people towards putting > their time/effort primarily into markup associated with explicitly > documented search features, i.e. https://developers. > google.com/search/docs/guides/search-features . While this seems a > reasonable way to use CollectionPage I'm not aware of any such features > that would make great use of the markup currently. > > cheers, > > Dan > > > >> Thank you for your help, >> Ilya. >> >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:34 PM, Richard Wallis < >> richard.wallis@dataliberate.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ilya, >>> >>> I would use CollectionPage <http://schema.org/CollectionPage>. However >>> I would describe each ‘link’ as a WebPage <http://schema.org/WebPage> >>> or WebSite <http://schema.org/WebSite> with its *url* being the link. >>> >>> ~Richard. >>> >>> Richard Wallis >>> Founder, Data Liberate >>> http://dataliberate.com >>> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis >>> Twitter: @rjw >>> >>> On 31 May 2018 at 09:55, Ilya Petrov <ilyaigpetrov@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>> What is the best schema for a page <https://sukhoylog.github.io/sites> >>>> that contains a categorized list of local sites/urls of my small town? >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Ilya. >>>> >>> >>> >>
Received on Sunday, 3 June 2018 06:27:15 UTC