W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > January 2018

Re: has boundry - Do we have something close ?

From: Vicki Tardif <vtardif@google.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 23:28:40 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOr1obGki8kocR0tXZWDzj1ubSZ25ixKwGEBYutbnROZdKZD8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
I was more thinking geospatiallyTouches. Although even then I am not sure
that is correct as it relates two geometries and reducing the Walls of
Jerusalem to a geometry is strange.

- Vicki

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:

> Right understood Vicki.  The high-level semantics I am less interested
> in... I'm more interested in just the Place domain.
>
> Hmm...on further thought...It seems it might be just a reverse property of
> "geospatiallyContains" ?
>
> Walls of Jerusalem "geospatiallyContains" Old City of Jerusalem
> Old City of Jerusalem "has boundary" Walls of Jerusalem
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 24 January 2018 04:29:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:12:38 UTC