Re: has boundry - Do we have something close ?

I was more thinking geospatiallyTouches. Although even then I am not sure
that is correct as it relates two geometries and reducing the Walls of
Jerusalem to a geometry is strange.

- Vicki

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:

> Right understood Vicki.  The high-level semantics I am less interested
> in... I'm more interested in just the Place domain.
>
> Hmm...on further thought...It seems it might be just a reverse property of
> "geospatiallyContains" ?
>
> Walls of Jerusalem "geospatiallyContains" Old City of Jerusalem
> Old City of Jerusalem "has boundary" Walls of Jerusalem
>
>