W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > January 2018

Re: has boundry - Do we have something close ?

From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:21:28 +0000
Message-ID: <CAChbWaNUJEdL=OxU7O7yxHh0NAt2jwHwVO+frs83_OOvFXbOig@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
Touches or Within ... seem to be the closest semantically to "has boundry"
and Wikidata's examples... yes/no ?

I failed Geography in High School with an A-  not an A+  :)  So help here
appreciated from anyone.


On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:17 AM Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:

> (resending with list cc:'d. I do not know of any documented consumption of
> these yet)
>
> On 23 January 2018 at 15:16, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Have a look around
>>
>> issue-1375 Types (1)
>> GeospatialGeometry <http://pending.schema.org/GeospatialGeometry>
>> issue-1375 Properties (10)
>> geospatiallyContains <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyContains>,
>> geospatiallyCoveredBy <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyCoveredBy>,
>> geospatiallyCovers <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyCovers>,
>> geospatiallyCrosses <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyCrosses>,
>> geospatiallyDisjoint <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyDisjoint>,
>> geospatiallyEquals <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyEquals>,
>> geospatiallyIntersects <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyIntersects>
>> , geospatiallyOverlaps <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyOverlaps>,
>> geospatiallyTouches <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyTouches>,
>> geospatiallyWithin <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyWithin>
>>
>> in http://pending.schema.org/ and
>> http://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1375
>>
>> This was in collaboration with W3C's Spatial Web WG. It is an attempt to
>> capture a set of related distinctions, alongside
>> http://schema.org/GeoShape and /box, and http://schema.org/GeoCircle ....
>>
>> On 23 January 2018 at 15:06, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "has boundry"
>>> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P4777
>>> the element that's on the two dimensional border that surrounds the
>>> subject; the limit of an entity.
>>>
>>> Do we have something close to "has boundry" already ?
>>>
>>> Examples:
>>> Old City of Jerusalem <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q213274>
>>> has boundary <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P4777>
>>> Walls of Jerusalem <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2918723>
>>>
>>> peritoneal cavity <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1030169>
>>> has boundary <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P4777>
>>> peritoneum <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q9629>
>>>
>>> <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q9629>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2018 15:22:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:12:38 UTC