- From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:21:28 +0000
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAChbWaNUJEdL=OxU7O7yxHh0NAt2jwHwVO+frs83_OOvFXbOig@mail.gmail.com>
Touches or Within ... seem to be the closest semantically to "has boundry" and Wikidata's examples... yes/no ? I failed Geography in High School with an A- not an A+ :) So help here appreciated from anyone. On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:17 AM Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > (resending with list cc:'d. I do not know of any documented consumption of > these yet) > > On 23 January 2018 at 15:16, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > >> Have a look around >> >> issue-1375 Types (1) >> GeospatialGeometry <http://pending.schema.org/GeospatialGeometry> >> issue-1375 Properties (10) >> geospatiallyContains <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyContains>, >> geospatiallyCoveredBy <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyCoveredBy>, >> geospatiallyCovers <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyCovers>, >> geospatiallyCrosses <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyCrosses>, >> geospatiallyDisjoint <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyDisjoint>, >> geospatiallyEquals <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyEquals>, >> geospatiallyIntersects <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyIntersects> >> , geospatiallyOverlaps <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyOverlaps>, >> geospatiallyTouches <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyTouches>, >> geospatiallyWithin <http://pending.schema.org/geospatiallyWithin> >> >> in http://pending.schema.org/ and >> http://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1375 >> >> This was in collaboration with W3C's Spatial Web WG. It is an attempt to >> capture a set of related distinctions, alongside >> http://schema.org/GeoShape and /box, and http://schema.org/GeoCircle .... >> >> On 23 January 2018 at 15:06, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> "has boundry" >>> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P4777 >>> the element that's on the two dimensional border that surrounds the >>> subject; the limit of an entity. >>> >>> Do we have something close to "has boundry" already ? >>> >>> Examples: >>> Old City of Jerusalem <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q213274> >>> has boundary <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P4777> >>> Walls of Jerusalem <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2918723> >>> >>> peritoneal cavity <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1030169> >>> has boundary <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P4777> >>> peritoneum <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q9629> >>> >>> <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q9629> >>> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2018 15:22:04 UTC