Re: Additions to Schema.org

I thought stuff like this is why extensions to schema.org exist in the
first place.  Shouldn't topics like this exist as an extension rather than
polluting the schema with everything under the sun?  Can someone verify
this if I'm not mistaken.  Thanks.

Mark

On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:31 PM Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Pavly, all possible contributors:
> Thanks for your proposals!
> I think it is important to explain that the schema.org community is
> generally conservative about adding new elements, because new elements come
> at a cost: They make the vocabulary more difficult to learn, use, and
> manage, and they increase the risk of unintended side-effects, like the
> duplication of alternative elements that are similar to existing ones.
>
> As a general guideline, we need more specific subtypes only
>
> - if there are, or are likely, applications by major consumers of the data
> that will need the additional specificity, i.e. that will handle entity
> data differently based on the specific type. For instance "Parking Lot" and
> "Amusement Park" as subtypes of "Place" are needed only if e.g. Google
> would display them differently or if they require additional properties
> that will be weird at a more abstract type. But in general, we rather put
> properties one level higher in the type hierarchy rather than adding a
> subtype only for having a proper place for a property. Otherwise, it will
> be perfectly fine to use abstract types like "Place" or even "Thing". And
> then there is always the additionalType property and support for
> multi-typed entities with external vocabularies;
>
> - if the distinction can be expected to be easily populated, e.g. because
> it matches database schemas or HTML templates of many sites;
>
> AND
>
> - if the distinction cannot be easily reconstructed from other data
> sources. For instance, we added a mechanism for EXIF meta-data when we
> added the PropertyValue mechanism:
>
>     https://schema.org/exifData
>
> This was arguably not really needed, because a search engine parsing the
> image data can also extract the same meta-data therefrom.
>
> This is an edge-case, but I hope you get the idea. Other examples are
> pieces of information or meta-data that is readily available from HTTP
> protocol meta-data or the HTML DOM tree. The latter is again arguable,
> because we might want to have elements in schema.org that can be
> reconstructed from HTML, but not from data in other syntaxes.
>
> I hope this is helpful.
>
> Best wishes
> Martin Hepp
>
> -----------------------------------
> martin hepp  http://www.heppnetz.de
> mhepp@computer.org          @mfhepp
>
>
>
>
> > On 09 Aug 2018, at 19:11, Pavly Mikhael <pavlym@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for getting back to me.
> > If schema.org can combine with wikidata.org, that would be great.
> > Meanwhile, I would much appreciate if you guys can add at least the
> following:
> >
> > OrthodoxChurch (Wiki refers to this as Eastern Orthodox Church), maybe
> you can name this 'EasternOrthodoxChurch'
> > OrientalOrthodoxChurch (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q49377), which is
> different from Eastern Orthodox Church
> > Biography
> > Excerpt
> > Quote
> > Lyric
> > Song
> > EthnicGroup
> > SaintIcon
> > ChurchRite
> >
> > Notes:
> >       • OrientalOrthodoxChurch will be relevant to our Coptic Orthodox
> Church.
> >       • The ones in red were not in my original list.
> > I will be glad to help if you guys need.
> >
> > Thanks again and have a great one!
> > Pavly Mikhael
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:19 PM Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
> > That is quite some list! If we went into such detail (and we won't) we
> would be as big as Wikipedia. And in fact Wikipedia have their own
> "knowledge graph" called Wikidata.org that does go into many of these
> details. We are working out ways of combining it with Schema.org.
> >
> > That said, you are correct in particular to remind us that
> https://schema.org/PlaceOfWorship.only has dedicated subtypes for a few
> religions. Perhaps an additionalType property with
> https://wikidata.org/wiki/Q2031836  as its value would be a good fit?
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > On Thu, 9 Aug 2018, 08:45 Pavly Mikhael, <pavlym@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > I'm trying to create structured data for our church website and was
> looking for the following vocabulary in schema.org and could not find any
> of them:
> >
> > Nonprofit (Can be added under Organization)
> > History
> > HistoryOfCopticOrthodoxChurchOfAlexandria (Can be added under History)
> > OrientalOrthodox
> > OrthodoxChurch (Can be added under PlaceOfWorship)
> > CopticOrthodoxChurchOfAlexandria (Can be added under OrientalOrthodox)
> > Archdiocese
> > Diocese
> > Bishopric
> > Monastery
> > Monasticism
> > Seminary
> > Coptic (Can be added under Language)
> > Religion
> > Christianity (Can be added under Religion)
> > Group
> > EthnoreligiousGroup (Can be added under Group)
> > Copts (Can be added under EthnoreligiousGroup)
> > EthnicGroup
> > Christian
> > Icon
> > SaintIcon (Can be added under Icon)
> > CanonicalBook (Can be added under Book)
> > LiturgicalBook (Can be added under Book)
> > PrayerBook (Can be added under Book)
> > Bible (Can be added under Book)
> > BibleBook (Can be added under Bible)
> > Chapter (Can be added under Bible)
> > Verse (Can be added under Bible)
> > Apostle (Can be added under Person)
> > Deacon (Can be added under Person)
> > SubDeacon (Can be added under Deacon)
> > Reader (Can be added under Deacon)
> > Chanter (Can be added under Deacon)
> > Archdeacon (Can be added under Deacon)
> > Cantor (Can be added under Person)
> > Clergy (Can be added under Person)
> > Priest (Can be added under Clergy)
> > Hegomen (Can be added under Clergy)
> > Bishop (Can be added under Person)
> > Metropolitan (Can be added under Person)
> > Pope (Can be added under Person)
> > Layman (Can be added under Person)
> > Monk (Can be added under Person)
> > Nun (Can be added under Person)
> > Saint (Can be added under Person)
> > Martyr (Can be added under Person)
> > ChurchFathers (Can be added under Person)
> > Prophet (Can be added under Person)
> > Prophecy
> > Biography
> > Council
> > Heresy
> > Faith
> > Belief
> > Doctrine
> > Tradition
> > Ministry
> > Missionary (Can be added under Person)
> > Spiritual
> > SpiritualBeing
> > Angel (Can be added under SpiritualBeing)
> > ArchAngel (Can be added under SpiritualBeing)
> > ChurchRite
> > Dogma
> > ChurchHymn
> > ChurchChoir
> > Song
> > SpiritualSong (Can be added under Song)
> > Praise (Can be added under Song)
> > Prayer
> > Psalm
> > Fast
> > Feast
> > Sacrament
> > Theology
> > Liturgy
> >
> > Can you please add these if possible.
> >
> > Thanks and have a great one!
> > Pavly Mikhael
> >
>
>
>

-- 
- Mark