- From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:59:24 +0100
- To: Joe Pairman <joepairman@gmail.com>
- Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAD47Kz7uRMWJXTxRTzhTmZsEwsN+2wU=+3e-s9-mVwbPzDd8Gw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Joe, I intend to write a fuller description with examples of the use MTEs. However in the meantime you might like to checkout my post describing enhancements to the TouristAttraction type <http://dataliberate.com/2017/09/19/schema-org-for-tourism/>. It makes use of multi-type entities and has several examples using the technique. As to how we work, propose & submit enhancements etc., you might find the *how we work <http://schema.org/docs/howwework.html> *document and my “schema.org in practice” articles: part 1 <http://dataliberate.com/2016/02/10/evolving-schema-org-in-practice-pt1-the-bits-and-pieces/> , 2 <http://dataliberate.com/2016/02/25/evolving-schema-org-in-practice-pt2-working-within-the-vocabulary/>, and 3 <http://dataliberate.com/2016/03/01/evolving-schema-org-in-practice-pt3-choosing-where-to-extend/>. useful. ~Richard. Richard Wallis Founder, Data Liberate http://dataliberate.com Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis Twitter: @rjw On 19 September 2017 at 08:48, Joe Pairman <joepairman@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Thank you for the information. An example of such a multi-type entity > would be very useful. Is there a facility for cross-linking between the two > types so that people looking at HowTo could also see the possible joint use > with TechArticle? (I'm not sure how the docs are generated; I assume > automatically from an RDFSs source, so not sure if arbitrary > cross-referencing is possible.) > > Who would normally update the documents? As it happens, I'll need to come > up with an example of this multi-type entity myself for an upcoming > presentation — would it be helpful if I made that available as a possible > example to use in the docs? > > Joe > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Richard Wallis < > richard.wallis@dataliberate.com> wrote: > >> Hi Joe, >> >> The simple answer to your question is that there was probably very little >> connection between the recent development of the HowTo >> <http://schema.org/HowTo> type and its predecessor (by a long time) >> TechArticle <http://schema.org/TechArticle>. It certainly escaped my >> notice that ‘*Example: How-to topics, step-by-step*,’ was part of the >> TechArticle description. >> >> For your article that has procedural info use case I would agree that a >> multi-type entity would be the most suitable solution. >> >> I suggest that the description of TechArticle is tweaked a little to >> reference such a use, and an example or two added. >> >> ~Richard. >> >
Received on Tuesday, 19 September 2017 15:59:48 UTC