- From: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex.ru>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 01:14:02 +0100
- To: public-schemaorg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <op.y8x5lojoftbnq3@desktop-kurf4r9.home>
On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 22:21:05 +0100, Bryan Warren <bryanwarrenalvarez@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, I am new to schema.org. and I am not a semantic/ontology expert. > I am working on an ontology that has quite a few terms that I can easily > find in >schema.org. I know schema.org is not an ontology, I am taking > it as a controlled vocabulary. could an ontology reusing terms from > schema.org have an >advantage over those that could reuse terms but > choose not to do it? If you use actual schema terms, then there are schema.or processors that will likely understand some of your stuff, although they probably don't understand general ontologies. If you use the same names, there are probably many people who are familiar enough with schema.org that they will understand some of your ontology already. (If you use different ones, those people are reasonably likely to make some mistakes confusing the two things they work with). Does that help? cheers Chaals -- Chaals is Charles McCathie Nevile find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Tuesday, 31 October 2017 00:14:37 UTC