W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > October 2017

Re: schema-onto

From: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex.ru>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 01:14:02 +0100
To: public-schemaorg@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.y8x5lojoftbnq3@desktop-kurf4r9.home>
On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 22:21:05 +0100, Bryan Warren  
<bryanwarrenalvarez@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all, I am new to schema.org. and I am not a semantic/ontology expert.  
> I am working on an ontology that has quite a few terms that I can easily  
> find in >schema.org. I know schema.org is not an ontology, I am taking  
> it as a controlled vocabulary. could an ontology reusing terms from  
> schema.org have an >advantage over those that could reuse terms but  
> choose not to do it?

If you use actual schema terms, then there are schema.or processors that  
will likely understand some of your stuff, although they probably don't  
understand general ontologies. If you use the same names, there are  
probably many people who are familiar enough with schema.org that they  
will understand some of your ontology already. (If you use different ones,  
those people are reasonably likely to make some mistakes confusing the two  
things they work with).

Does that help?



Chaals is Charles McCathie Nevile
find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Tuesday, 31 October 2017 00:14:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:12:37 UTC