W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > May 2017

Re: Proposal – extension for Athletics

From: Martin Alvarez-Espinar <martin.alvarez@fundacionctic.org>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 07:24:43 +0000
Message-ID: <CAL8AgZRzw0O3LcFXnzMb1iJF_bijHQOAQfvdkxdjdz8SrkjwzQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, Martin Alvarez-Espinar <martin@w3.org>, Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
Cc: Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
Hi Timothy,

This vocabulary for athletics is including too specific information about
track and field competitions, but there are some parts that can be reused
in other sports. For instance, the structure of competitions is aligned
with the BBC Sports Ontology [1] —with application to all sports—

Apart from competitions, dome other new classes (e.g.,
'SportsGoverningBody', 'Performance', 'captain' of a 'SportsTeam', or
'Athlete') could be also interesting for other sports. I'm adding also
information used by SportsML.

So, now I have a doubt about the strategy of schema.org extensions. This
proposal would be too constrained for Athletics, so I wonder if this should
be under either *athletics*.schema.org or *sports*.schema.org.

Best,

Martin

[1] http://www.bbc.co.uk/ontologies/sport#


On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 7:19 PM Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
wrote:

> One might consider the field of sport to perhaps warrant sport.Schema.org?
> (Without wanting to make it too complicated).
>
> On Fri., 26 May 2017, 3:15 am Thad Guidry, <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Also the idea of an "Attempt"... that's a great reusable Type for many
>> Things in many Domains.  Field Trial is too narrow...see if this can be
>> expanded to just an "Attempt" Type where a Field Trial might be a subtype
>> of Attempt.
>>
>> Space-X made many attempts at reaching a goal or milestone of
>> successfully launching and landing a reusable rocket.
>>
>> https://w3c.github.io/opentrack-cg/spec/model/overview#field-trials
>>
>> trial(s) Athlete’s attempt in this round of trials.
>> Field Trial
>> <https://w3c.github.io/opentrack-cg/spec/model/overview#field-trials>
>>
>> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:07 PM Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Regarding the property of "round number" on
>>> https://w3c.github.io/opentrack-cg/spec/model/overview#field-trials-rounds
>>> "Number of the round of trials" is a confusing definition.  But I think
>>> someone is trying to explain that this can be used to say things like "1st
>>> round", "2nd round"... 1, 2, ...  You or someone might want to rephrase the
>>> definition so it is more clear.
>>>
>>> Also, this definition should not use "the" but replace it with "a" , so
>>> that it means an identifier for 1 round...not the set of round of trials.
>>> identifier Unique character string to identify the round of trials.
>>> Actually, I see a lot of those kinds of mistakes across many of the
>>> definitions in the opentrack-cg.
>>>
>>> -Thad
>>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:45 AM Martin Alvarez-Espinar <martin@w3.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Thad,
>>>>
>>>> I'm still drafting the proposal. I hope I can share it with you soon.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>
Received on Friday, 26 May 2017 07:25:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:12:35 UTC