- From: Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 09:48:54 -0700
- To: Tim Finin <finin@umbc.edu>
- Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMbipBv3DvPU+GNcJO7=b3VmX8Prw0zzDXrdBTnhHJn-+VDP5A@mail.gmail.com>
I haven't re-checked since I tweeted this on 11 April, but at that time
PolitiFact seemed also was using a scale that was the inverse of the
schema's specs:
https://twitter.com/aaranged/status/851902710307737600
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Tim Finin <finin@umbc.edu> wrote:
> Today I checked to see if the Washington Post is using schema.org's
> ClaimReview in one of their Fact Checker
> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/> pieces. They are
> (that's great!) but I think that WaPo has misunderstood the semantics of
> the markup by reversing the reviewRating scale. I wonder if other fact
> checking sites have made a similar mistake.
>
> For an example, look at this Fact Checker article
> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/05/08/decoding-hhs-secretary-prices-spin-on-the-american-health-care-act/>
> about claims made by HHS Secretary Tom Price on the AHCA which WaPo rates
> as being very false, but gives it a high reviewRating of 5 on their scale
> from 1 to 6.
>
> WaPo's Fact Check article ratings
> <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/about-the-fact-checker/>
> assign a checkmark for a claim they find true and from one to four
> 'Pinocchios' for claims they find to be partially (one) or totally (four)
> false. They also give no rating for claims they find unclear and a
> 'flip-flop' rating for claims on which a person has been inconsistent.
>
> Their reviewRating markup goes specifies a worstRating of 1 and a
> bestRating of 6. They map a checkmark to 1 and 'four pinocchios' to 5. It
> appears that their mapping is
>
> {-1:'unclear'; 1:'check mark', 2:'1 pinocchio', ..., 5:'4 pinocchios',
> 6:'flip flop'}
>
>
> My understanding is that the intended semantics of a reciewRating is that
> a higher number is better and it's implicit is that it is better for a
> claim to be true.
>
> So I assume that the WaPo FactCheck should reverse its scale, with
> 'flip-flop' getting a 1, 'four pinocchios' getting a 2 and a checkmark
> getting a 6.
>
> I wonder if other fact checking sites also have made this mistake/
>
> --
> Tim Finin, Computer Science & Electrical Engineering, U. Maryland,
> Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle,
> Baltimore MD 21250. http://umbc.edu/~finin, mobile:410-499-3522
> <(410)%20499-3522>, finin@umbc.edu, tfinin@gmail.com
>
Received on Monday, 8 May 2017 16:49:30 UTC