- From: Aaron Bradley <aaranged@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 09:48:54 -0700
- To: Tim Finin <finin@umbc.edu>
- Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMbipBv3DvPU+GNcJO7=b3VmX8Prw0zzDXrdBTnhHJn-+VDP5A@mail.gmail.com>
I haven't re-checked since I tweeted this on 11 April, but at that time PolitiFact seemed also was using a scale that was the inverse of the schema's specs: https://twitter.com/aaranged/status/851902710307737600 On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Tim Finin <finin@umbc.edu> wrote: > Today I checked to see if the Washington Post is using schema.org's > ClaimReview in one of their Fact Checker > <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/> pieces. They are > (that's great!) but I think that WaPo has misunderstood the semantics of > the markup by reversing the reviewRating scale. I wonder if other fact > checking sites have made a similar mistake. > > For an example, look at this Fact Checker article > <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2017/05/08/decoding-hhs-secretary-prices-spin-on-the-american-health-care-act/> > about claims made by HHS Secretary Tom Price on the AHCA which WaPo rates > as being very false, but gives it a high reviewRating of 5 on their scale > from 1 to 6. > > WaPo's Fact Check article ratings > <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/about-the-fact-checker/> > assign a checkmark for a claim they find true and from one to four > 'Pinocchios' for claims they find to be partially (one) or totally (four) > false. They also give no rating for claims they find unclear and a > 'flip-flop' rating for claims on which a person has been inconsistent. > > Their reviewRating markup goes specifies a worstRating of 1 and a > bestRating of 6. They map a checkmark to 1 and 'four pinocchios' to 5. It > appears that their mapping is > > {-1:'unclear'; 1:'check mark', 2:'1 pinocchio', ..., 5:'4 pinocchios', > 6:'flip flop'} > > > My understanding is that the intended semantics of a reciewRating is that > a higher number is better and it's implicit is that it is better for a > claim to be true. > > So I assume that the WaPo FactCheck should reverse its scale, with > 'flip-flop' getting a 1, 'four pinocchios' getting a 2 and a checkmark > getting a 6. > > I wonder if other fact checking sites also have made this mistake/ > > -- > Tim Finin, Computer Science & Electrical Engineering, U. Maryland, > Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, > Baltimore MD 21250. http://umbc.edu/~finin, mobile:410-499-3522 > <(410)%20499-3522>, finin@umbc.edu, tfinin@gmail.com >
Received on Monday, 8 May 2017 16:49:30 UTC