W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > March 2017

Re: Schema addition request

From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 00:01:54 +0000
Message-ID: <CAM1Sok0LGCF45fqkkFMtma=b9na1K9CSLe0MV4ufx9f4haCHUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, Brian Tremblay <schema@btrem.com>, public-schemaorg@w3.org
Oh, actually.  I realised that the term "diet" gets results for pet foods,
protein powders and books.

Can people exclude those sorts or results to get a "trend accuracy" scale?

Tim.

On Sun., 19 Mar. 2017, 10:59 am Timothy Holborn, <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Awesome link.
>
> Thinks like Genre wouldn't turn up though.  We got use to it by the
> sections in a paper, libraries or editorial process.   So, this whole "fake
> news" issue, whilst a very old problem, now has new means to fix.
>
> Unless you have a means to index fake news trends?
>
> :P
>
> Tim.
>
> On Sun., 19 Mar. 2017, 10:30 am Thad Guidry, <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Brian,
>
> If you have just one or more people in the world searching for a term its
> called Long Tail.
> If there are zero people searching for a term, its called No Tail. :)
>
> I'm a Data Architect by day...so I'd rather just show you the data and
> everyone can draw their own conclusions on usefulness or not.
> Mind you, the below trending data is just from one search engine, not all,
> and not even my applications or yours. :)
>
>
> https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?geo=US&q=medical%20spa,day%20spa,medical%20clinc
>
> A gap in my mind is when I see data that shows more than No Tail. i.e.,
> there is some usefulness for some folks.
> In the data it seems that there is even more usefulness for Day Spa and
> Medical Spa, then there is for Medical Clinc.
>
> -Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 4:49 PM Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I'd say they're probably looking for news genres or indeed nonFiction,
> more than the medicalSpa - maybe different commercial implications?
> Priorities...  ;)
>
> Tim.h.
>
> On Sun., 19 Mar. 2017, 5:58 am Brian Tremblay, <schema@btrem.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/17/17 6:13 AM, Thad Guidry wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 7:59 AM BJM <bryanjm179@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Would like to propose the addition of "MedicalSpa" to the schema
> >> library.
> >
> > +1 for MedicalSpa.  Looks like an industry gap that needs filled
>
> Really? What is this gap? Are there search engines looking for this
> schema? Are there /any/ tools that would use this new type?
>
> --
> Brian Tremblay
>
> --
> Brian Tremblay
>
>
Received on Sunday, 19 March 2017 00:02:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:12:34 UTC