- From: Robb Shecter <robb@weblaws.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 01:18:44 +0000
- To: public-schemaorg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CABQwFw9GFPXbfgej4DiBaxY16mv4nBNahp+9JWs5xucXqswyPA@mail.gmail.com>
> In this case, is there some benefit to labeling something > > GovernmentOrganization instead of just Organization? > > I'm think it's probably worse: there's a detriment to using GovernmentOrganization because it may not be recognized, and so just silently discarded. I realized that I actually have a small successful test case, using GovernmentOrganization as a property, not as the main type. My app openhealthscores.com gets this search engine result for a page: [image: Screen Shot 2017-03-01 at 5.09.04 PM.png] I'm pretty sure that "New York City Department..." is sourced from this schema.org/json-ld in the HTML source <https://openhealthscores.com/us/ny/nyc/novecento/40392141>: [image: Screen Shot 2017-03-01 at 5.10.20 PM.png] So I conclude that although Google Search doesn't claim to support GovernmentOrganization, they are using its data as if it's the super-class Organization. This may be a case of Google being very permissive with the code, just like they're permissive with malformed HTML. I.e., there's an *author/name* attribute and so they're using it. The *@type* doesn't matter so much for their purposes here.
Attachments
- image/png attachment: Screen_Shot_2017-03-01_at_5.09.04_PM.png
- image/png attachment: Screen_Shot_2017-03-01_at_5.10.20_PM.png
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2017 01:28:08 UTC