- From: Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 16:33:17 +0000
- To: "public-schemaorg@w3.org" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>, "public-argumentation@w3.org" <public-argumentation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BY2PR01MB18802199468F98263A17F313C57D0@BY2PR01MB1880.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Schema.org Community Group, Argumentation Community Group, Thank you for your feedback and comments so far. I’ve refactored the schemas. https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schemas/ I’m exploring two approaches to modeling argument maps. A first approach is to model the relationships between statements or quotations. Relationship — Extends Intangible<https://schema.org/Intangible>. A relationship between a subject and an object. subject: Text<http://schema.org/Text> or Quotation<https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schemas/> or Relationship<https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schemas/> or ItemList<https://schema.org/ItemList> or URI object: Text<http://schema.org/Text> or Quotation<https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schemas/> or Relationship<https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schemas/> or ItemList<https://schema.org/ItemList> or URI A second approach is to model statements which extend CreativeWork and which can be interrelated. Statement — Extends CreativeWork<http://schema.org/CreativeWork>. A statement. supports: Statement<https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schemas/> or ItemList<https://schema.org/ItemList> supportedBy: Statement<https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schemas/> or ItemList<https://schema.org/ItemList> opposes: Statement<https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schemas/> or ItemList<https://schema.org/ItemList> opposedby: Statement<https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schemas/> or ItemList<https://schema.org/ItemList> I’ll explore how the approaches work in Microdata, RDFa and JSON-LD. Regardless of approach 1 or 2, a topic of argumentation schemas is to convenience the expression of agreement and disagreement and to support the expression of rationale for so doing. AgreeQuotation — Extends Quotation<https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schemas/>. A quotation which is agreed with. rationale: Text<http://schema.org/Text> or ItemList<https://schema.org/ItemList> DisagreeQuotation — Extends Quotation<https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schemas/>. A quotation which is disagreed with. rationale: Text<http://schema.org/Text> or ItemList<https://schema.org/ItemList> Best regards, Adam Sobieski
Received on Monday, 16 January 2017 16:33:54 UTC