- From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:46:45 +0000
- To: Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com>
- Cc: "public-schemaorg@w3.org" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>, "public-argumentation@w3.org" <public-argumentation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAD47Kz43cv6L6Mh6VWK7R0Re4Vgc5YTd8LzY6CitcV_AE6Y_oQ@mail.gmail.com>
I think some examples could be helpful in understanding here. Is Quote intended to be a subtype of CreativeWork? Are AgreeQuote & DisagreeQuote really necessary. Would a single type (named *QualifiedQuote* ?) with a boolean property *agree* not be simpler? Definitely need some examples to understand what is intended by *SchemeAplication*. “Specifies a relation between a subject and object” could be a generic description of RDF. There is also already a proposal for a *Quotation* type which is subject of a longstanding issue on GitHub (#271 <https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/271>) and a pending example Quotation <http://pending.webschemas.org/Quotation>. This has a broader definition that will cover spoken as well as written quotes. There is also a discussion in that thread as to the benefits of using *Quote* or *Quotation*. We should not lose sight of the needs in that thread as well as what is being discussed/proposed here. ~Richard Richard Wallis Founder, Data Liberate http://dataliberate.com Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis Twitter: @rjw On 13 January 2017 at 02:24, Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com> wrote: > Schema.org Community Group, > Argumentation Community Group, > > *Quote* — A quotation. > itemQuoted: *CreativeWork* <http://schema.org/CreativeWork> or URL > quote: *Text* <http://schema.org/Text> > > *AgreeQuote* — Extends *Quote* > <https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schema/>. A quotation which > is agreed with. > rationale: *Text* <http://schema.org/Text> or *SchemeApplication* > <https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schema/> or *ItemList* > <https://schema.org/ItemList> > > *DisagreeQuote* — Extends *Quote* > <https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schema/>. A quotation which > is disagreed with. > rationale: *Text* <http://schema.org/Text> or *SchemeApplication* > <https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schema/> or *ItemList* > <https://schema.org/ItemList> > > *SchemeApplication* — Specifies a relation between a subject and object. > subject: *Text* <http://schema.org/Text> or *Quote* > <https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schema/> or > *SchemeApplication* <https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schema/> > or *ItemList* <https://schema.org/ItemList> or URI > object: *Text* <http://schema.org/Text> or *Quote* > <https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schema/> or > *SchemeApplication* <https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schema/> > or *ItemList* <https://schema.org/ItemList> or URI > > *CustomSchemeApplication* — Extends *SchemeApplication* > <https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schema/>. > relation: URI > > https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/schemas/ > > Best regards, > Adam Sobieski > *http://www.phoster.com/contents/* <http://www.phoster.com/contents/> > *https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/* > <https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/> > *https://www.w3.org/community/collaboration/* > <https://www.w3.org/community/collaboration/> > > *From:* Adam Sobieski <adamsobieski@hotmail.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, January 12, 2017 6:00 PM > *To:* public-schemaorg@w3.org, public-argumentation@w3.org > > Schema.org Community Group, > Argumentation Community Group, > > Here are some initial thoughts with regard to argumentation schema. > Feedback and comments are welcomed toward the new schema and toward a > specification document, an Argumentation Community Group Report. > > *Quote*: text from a document at a URL > itemQuoted: Thing or URL > quote: Text > > *AgreeQuote*: extends Quote; text from a document at a URL which is > agreed with, includes text rationale for agreement > rationale: Text > > *DisagreeQuote*: extends Quote; text from a document at a URL which is > disagreed with, includes text rationale for disagreement > rationale: Text > > “Text or Quote”: document text or text from a document at a URL (maps with > AIF2 Statement) > “Text or Quote or SchemeApplication”: (maps with AIF2 Node) > > *SchemeApplication*: Relates two nodes (maps with AIF2 SchemeApplication) > subject: Text or Quote or SchemeApplication or URI > object: Text or Quote or SchemeApplication or URI > > *CustomSchemeApplication*: (extends SchemeApplication) > relation: URI > > > Best regards, > Adam Sobieski > *http://www.phoster.com/contents/* <http://www.phoster.com/contents/> > *https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/* > <https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/> > *https://www.w3.org/community/collaboration/* > <https://www.w3.org/community/collaboration/> > >
Received on Friday, 13 January 2017 11:47:19 UTC