Schema.org Community Group,
Argumentation Community Group,
Here are some initial thoughts with regard to argumentation schema. Feedback and comments are welcomed toward the new schema and toward a specification document, an Argumentation Community Group Report.
Quote: text from a document at a URL
itemQuoted: Thing or URL
? quote: Text
AgreeQuote: extends Quote; text from a document at a URL which is agreed with, includes text rationale for agreement
rationale: Text
DisagreeQuote: extends Quote; text from a document at a URL which is disagreed with, includes text rationale for disagreement
rationale: Text
"Text or Quote": document text or text from a document at a URL (maps with AIF2 Statement)
"Text or Quote or SchemeApplication": (maps with AIF2 Node)
SchemeApplication: Relates two nodes (maps with AIF2 SchemeApplication)
subject: Text or Quote or SchemeApplication or URI
object: Text or Quote or SchemeApplication or URI
CustomSchemeApplication: (extends SchemeApplication)
relation: URI
Best regards,
Adam Sobieski
http://www.phoster.com/contents/
https://www.w3.org/community/argumentation/
https://www.w3.org/community/collaboration/