Re: Possible features

W3C has an intellectual property agreement pertaining to works done via
CG's etc.  In addition to a variety of editable wiki resources (many of
which when it comes to "semantic web" or ontology related tools, are out of
date) and FWIW I think it makes sense that we use this sophisticated
infrastructure in extension of the purpose it was built for ;)

Noting, this looks like a rather easy to use UX:
https://youtu.be/lKkbV6lXqNE

On Fri., 6 Jan. 2017, 4:48 am Hans Polak, <info@polak.es> wrote:

> Hi Brian,
>
> I think the list is meant for Schema.org semantic discussions, not for
> Schema Generator feature discussions.
>
> I try to be careful not to 'spam' the list too much as the tool is related
> to Schema.org, but independent from it.
>
> Maybe it is possible to set up a similar mailing list for this.
>
> Cheers,
> Hans
>
>
>
> On 01/05/2017 05:11 PM, Brian Tremblay wrote:
>
> On 1/5/17 2:56 AM, Hans Polak wrote:
>
>
> I've written down a number of features the Schema Generator
> <https://schema.pythonanywhere.com/> <https://schema.pythonanywhere.com/>
> tool could probably use.
>
> Could you take a look
> <https://www.patreon.com/posts/mind-boggles-7675366>
> <https://www.patreon.com/posts/mind-boggles-7675366> (and comment)?
>
>
> Why don't you post the features to this list?
>
>
>