- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 12:41:14 +0000
- To: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>, Elias Kaerle <elias.kaerle@sti2.at>, public-schemaorg@w3.org
- Cc: Russell Ruggiero <russell_ruggiero@hotmail.com>, Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>, Alejandro Revuelta <alejandro.revuelta@ximdex.com>, Phil Spreier <phil.spreier@3dpdfconsortium.org>
- Message-ID: <CAM1Sok3nQ6VeaEf29uRa1jJ=q0xVif-CEozQ12xXm_oiUivRfQ@mail.gmail.com>
"“party” ~ A meeting for which no records are kept." Hehe. On Sat., 25 Feb. 2017, 2:41 am Owen Ambur, <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote: > Elias and Timothy, in the StratML standard (ANSI/AIIM 22-2017) > stakeholders can be named, described, and designated as performers or > beneficiaries (or both) and their roles can also be named and described. > Usage of the standard will generate folksonomies of such terms, which can > eventually be recognized as formalized taxonomies if there is sufficient > interest and will to do so. > > > > The elements of the schema are documented at > http://stratml.us/references/oxygen/PerformancePlanOrReport20160216.htm > The schema itself is available at > http://stratml.us/references/PerformancePlanOrReport20160216.xsd > > > > To improve their effectiveness, it would be good if the agendas (goals) > and stakeholders of significant business events were documented in StratML > Part 2, Performance Plan or Report, format. Doing so would not only enable > more efficient collaboration before, during, and after each event but also > tracking and reporting of results (inputs, outputs & outcomes) ... in an > open, standard, machine-readable (XML) format. > > > > BTW, here’s my favorite definition of the term “party” ~ A meeting for > which no records are kept. I also like this definition of the word > “complaint” ~ An expression of a problem insufficient to effect a > solution. http://ambur.net/#Quotes Everyone loves a party but nobody > likes a complainer. > > > > Owen > > > > *From:* Timothy Holborn [mailto:timothy.holborn@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, February 24, 2017 8:42 AM > *To:* Elias Kaerle <elias.kaerle@sti2.at>; public-schemaorg@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: event --> speaker > > > > > > On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 at 00:32 Elias Kaerle <elias.kaerle@sti2.at> wrote: > > Maybe you can describe it as schema.org/BusinessEvent and use the event > > yup. BusinessEvent would work > > > > properties "actor" or "performer"? > > Can you give me 4 examples? Say > > > > - Whitehouse Press Briefing > > - Annual General Meeting for Alphabet > > - Tech Conference > > - SXSW > > > > Actors / Performers usually get paid to entertain... I guess it may work > for some people in some instances, but i thought the concept of 'presenter' > and/or 'speaker' would be helpful too... > > > > open to discussion about vocab of course. > > > > On 24.02.2017 13:22, Timothy Holborn wrote: > > I couldn't find speaker under event, useful for corporate events. > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. > > For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > -- > Elias Kärle, MSc > Semantic Technology Institute > University of Innsbruck > > ICT - Technologie Park Innsbruck > 2nd Floor, Room 3S02 > Technikerstrasse, 21a > 6020 Innsbruck > Austria > > Tel.: (+43) 512 507 53738 <+43%20512%2050753738> > Skype: elias.kaerle > >
Received on Saturday, 25 February 2017 12:41:59 UTC