W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > September 2016

Re: Health-Lifesci extension question

From: Marc Twagirumukiza <twamarc@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 10:24:42 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAu2OTWrNCatqJ0rwM+xMxytoLmw8GJ44wniHbvr6WB-LMfXRg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
Hi Thad,
IMHO this (wikidata) Diet https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q474191 is not
equivalent to (schema) Diet http://health-lifesci.schema.org/Diet

As you pointed out correctly the (wikidata) Diet
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q474191 points to the 'Diet' as defined by
nutritionist regardless to the fact that it's attached to a health -related
goal or not.

The (schema) Diet http://health-lifesci.schema.org/Diet  (as we have it
today) points to the dietary strategy, which is linking a specific diet to
the needed health-related goal. Actuary we should call it
'DietaryMeasure/DiateryStrategy' rather than 'Diet'
My 2 cents,

Marc

On 10 September 2016 at 03:38, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:

> As I am working through the Wikidata mapping to Schema.org...
>
> A question came up.
>
> Is Diet https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q474191
> the same as http://health-lifesci.schema.org/Diet  ??
>
> Note that the Wikidata topic on Diet points to an English Wikipedia
> article on Diet as known by nutritionist. (not necessarily about a Weight
> Loss Diet or strategy, but about a the sum of food intake, or the selection
> of foods choosen.
>
> I personally think I have the right equivalent class on the Wikidata
> topic, but wanted to check with others to make sure, since getting it wrong
> is taboo in the Health-Lifesci domain and can have grave consequences I'm
> sure.
>
> Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>
Received on Saturday, 10 September 2016 08:25:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 10 September 2016 08:25:52 UTC