Re: Reusing "status" property from the health-lifesci extension

Let's not deprecate it. We can add it to the core as a general purpose
super-property of case-specific status properties, if we can find
wording and structure that works ...

On 17 October 2016 at 22:51, Thomas Francart <thomas.francart@sparna.fr> wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2016-10-17 22:47 GMT+02:00 Marc . <twamarc@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> The property https://health-lifesci.schema.org/status is planned to be
>> deprecated because is too broad even in health_and_life science.
>> It will be superseded by ```studyStatus```.
>
>
> That solves the problem, then :-)
>
>>
>> Therefore I am in favour of having your own specialized property in
>> legislation vocab.
>
>
> Will keep "legislationLegalForce" then, maybe rename it to
> "legislationStatus", to be discussed.
>
> Thanks
> Thomas
>
>>
>>
>> See
>> also:https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1114#issuecomment-212845014
>>
>> Regards
>> Marc
>> ________________________________________
>>
>> On 17 October 2016 at 17:23, Thomas Francart <thomas.francart@sparna.fr>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> In the context of the ongoing proposed legal/legislation extension [1],
>>> we were suggested to reuse the "status" property instead of our
>>> "legislationLegalForce" referring to "LegalForceStatus" enumeration.
>>> We have nothing against the idea of using "status" instead of
>>> "legislationLegalForce" if we can keep the "LegalForceStatus" enumeration,
>>> except that "status" is currently defined in the health-lifesci extension
>>> [2]
>>> This raises some questions :
>>>
>>> What is the process for reusing terms from another extension ? should
>>> they be moved to core first, before being reused ?
>>> Should I go ahead and broaden the definition of "status" and its allowed
>>> range in the health-lifesci extension in my proposed pull request ? or
>>> should this be done by the responsible of the health-lifesci extension ?
>>> Should I simply open a separate issue to ask to broaden the definition of
>>> "status" ?
>>>
>>> My questions are really on the process/governance associated to the
>>> possible reuse of a property across extensions.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> [1] : https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1156
>>> [2] : https://health-lifesci.schema.org/status
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Thomas Francart - SPARNA
>>> Web de données | Architecture de l'information | Accès aux connaissances
>>> blog : blog.sparna.fr, site : sparna.fr, linkedin :
>>> fr.linkedin.com/in/thomasfrancart
>>> tel :  +33 (0)6.71.11.25.97, skype : francartthomas
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thomas Francart - SPARNA
> Web de données | Architecture de l'information | Accès aux connaissances
> blog : blog.sparna.fr, site : sparna.fr, linkedin :
> fr.linkedin.com/in/thomasfrancart
> tel :  +33 (0)6.71.11.25.97, skype : francartthomas

Received on Monday, 17 October 2016 20:56:39 UTC