CIVICS: Ontology Mapping

I have a use-case i'm working through in progressing
https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1337

The use-case is; two adults who have a child decide their relationship
isn't working.  They then become separated, disputes form, and
repercussions are impacted upon the humans involved.  (supposition: means
exists to privately share date to assist with public policy, ie: via
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1pFGC1G7CbizUuvbmjECfnNRL4fZk9QLxG8d3nehgwNU/edit
where an array of particular claims are made via ontology in regard to the
private access of point-data for the purpose of generating de-identified
reports)

Herein; A lack of data exists between an environment of 'happy family' to
that of something else, which statistically has poor outcomes for humans
(young and old).  Sometimes government is unwilling to provide data they
collect for social-security and taxation purposes; yet other NGO's have
data that is not addressed and this concerns them, as they believe the data
holds insights that may assist researchers in defining answers to human
problems that may become intergenerational.

It is assumed these factors have impacts on insurances, public-expenditure
on healthcare services, mental health, physical health, suicide statistics,
academic statistics of young persons and an array of other considerations.

Where government entities are not willing to provide reports of supplied
data; it seems reasonable to allow private institutions to supply data for
delivery in a non-identifying format.  Whilst some of the issues pertained
herein are beyond the considerations of the group; questions are as follows,

- Where known variables exist yet the response is a property; how are the
available options mapped?
Ie: A person is a recipient of a government payment -
https://www.humanservices.gov.au/customer/services/centrelink is an example
of a resource that can be provide structured data with known inferences.
I'm sure others exist elsewhere.

The government payments have standardised names.  Yet, if these were
entered as text rather than as an ontological selector, then the ability to
address those fields becomes diminished as it becomes necessary to target
'freetext' using semantic inferencing.

What is mapped within Schemaorg vs. what is best referenced elsewhere.  How
flexible is Schema.org in mapping circumstance of citizens world-wide in
provisioning a structured means to communicate that (in-part, for bots) and
what is the recommended process.

In someways the challenges for AI is that the structure information it
obtains is 'sales orientated' which results in a 'psychopath' like
programmatically capability; whereas in psychology,

attachmentRelationship
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=attachment%20relationship highlights an
array of neurological concept that can be relatively inferred by way of
data, and whilst i don't want that type of capability impacting my FB feed;
it's useful for humanity broadly to consider these sorts of intimate issues.

in-turn likely aiding in supporting the development of less psychopathic
bots / A.I.

Tim.