Re: Class hierarchy - MobilePhone

This is the closest thread I could find to a question I had, so apologies for taking it a bit off topic.

I’m curious why schema.org created domainIncludes and rangeIncludes rather than using rdfs:domain and refs:range? My first thought was for in internally consistent vocabulary, but I also noticed that there are also no relationships to those other terms via subPropertyOf or the like, so I can’t use any inferencing rules to get back to those rdfs definitions. Was this break deliberate in that the schema.org meta terms are meant to convey something different than the rdfs counterparts, and if so, what?

Thanks,

_howard

________________________________

This e-mail message is authorized for use by the intended recipient only and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you received this message in error, please call us immediately at (425) 590-5000 and ask to speak to the message sender. Please do not copy, disseminate, or retain this message unless you are the intended recipient. In addition, to ensure the security of your data, please do not send any unencrypted credit card or personally identifiable information to this email address. Thank you.