- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 16:18:31 +0100
- To: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@apple.com>, Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com>
- Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
+Martin Hepp On 3 May 2016 at 16:01, Alexandre Bertails <bertails@apple.com> wrote: > Folks, > > I am trying to encode the following things in Schema.org: > > 1. "iPhone is a Product family." > > 2. "iPhone 6s is part of the iPhone Product family." > > 3. all the Products of a Product family would be related to each other (schema:isRelatedTo), and/or similar to each other (schema:isSimilarTo). > > Except for 3., I cannot find something that would capture exactly the notion of Product family. You might look at http://schema.org/ProductModel and isVariantOf ("A pointer to a base product from which this product is a variant. It is safe to infer that the variant inherits all product features from the base model, unless defined locally. This is not transitive.") and predecessorOf/successorOf (which I now see should be marked as mutual inverses, issue filed as https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1142 ). I guess you'd need to figure out the constant "essence of iPhone" and make a generic ProductModel for that, and then relate them. I'm not sure how deep you'd want this to go e.g. I have an (excellent if ageing) iPad Mini, presumably part of an iPad Product family; would se use isSimilarTo vs iSvariantOf to link iPhone and iPad families together? Dan > Any idea? > > Alexandre
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2016 15:19:01 UTC