- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
 - Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 16:18:31 +0100
 - To: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@apple.com>, Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com>
 - Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
 
+Martin Hepp
On 3 May 2016 at 16:01, Alexandre Bertails <bertails@apple.com> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I am trying to encode the following things in Schema.org:
>
> 1. "iPhone is a Product family."
>
> 2. "iPhone 6s is part of the iPhone Product family."
>
> 3. all the Products of a Product family would be related to each other (schema:isRelatedTo), and/or similar to each other (schema:isSimilarTo).
>
> Except for 3., I cannot find something that would capture exactly the notion of Product family.
You might look at http://schema.org/ProductModel and isVariantOf ("A
pointer to a base product from which this product is a variant. It is
safe to infer that the variant inherits all product features from the
base model, unless defined locally. This is not transitive.") and
predecessorOf/successorOf (which I now see should be marked as mutual
inverses, issue filed as
https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1142 ).
I guess you'd need to figure out the constant "essence of iPhone" and
make a generic ProductModel for that, and then relate them. I'm not
sure how deep you'd want this to go e.g. I have an (excellent if
ageing) iPad Mini, presumably part of an iPad Product family; would se
use isSimilarTo vs iSvariantOf to link iPhone and iPad families
together?
Dan
> Any idea?
>
> Alexandre
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2016 15:19:01 UTC