- From: Hans Polak <info@polak.es>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 18:00:30 +0200
- To: public-schemaorg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5759929E.5060605@polak.es>
You can construct valid JSON-LD schemas with my tool here <https://schema.pythonanywhere.com/> On 06/09/2016 05:54 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: > On 7 June 2016 at 07:36, Bäck, Gerald <gerald@baeck.at> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am currently doing my first steps with JSON-LD and try it on my private >> blog. As far as I understand Blogposts do require a publisher field, which >> can only be an organisation. But I think it should be possible for persons >> to be publishers too, but I also would like to question, that blogposts or >> even Websites do need a publisher field at all. >> >> I tested my blog with Google's Structured Data Testing Tool. Interestingly >> enough the tool did not complain about the publisher being a Person, but >> that the publisher entitiy had no logo, which on the other hand is not >> allowed as a field for a person. >> >> https://search.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.baeck.at%2Fblog%2F2016%2F05%2F30%2FWahlmanipulationen%2F >> >> I also tested the root of my blog, which is defined as website, also with >> myself as a publisher person. This time the tool was fine with it. >> >> https://search.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.baeck.at%2F > Don't worry too much about complaints from that tool. Many of them are > its way of saying "your data might not be ideal for [some specific > search/product feature]" (e.g. showing logos for organizations in some > contexts). > > Dan > > >> thx, Gerald >> >> >> >> ---- >> DI Gerald Bäck | fb | blog | devblog | fitblog | +43 664 5107761
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2016 16:01:09 UTC