W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > January 2016

Re: Happy New Year from your friends at Wordnik

From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:15:57 +0000
Message-ID: <CAChbWaNQAXS0ezMEPycFi0vjpH09pC2zL7M2COLmxQVa6bQ3+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
Cc: Erin McKean <erin@wordnik.com>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
So EnumerationValue is like saying "term"? And EnumerationValueSet is like
saying "code for a "definition"?

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016, 3:33 AM Richard Wallis <
richard.wallis@dataliberate.com> wrote:

> Not a total answer but I believe that my proposal for EnumerationValue
> would be helpful here <https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/894>.
> There is an associated pull request (#924
> <https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/pull/924>) with example etc.  One
> of the examples being a term from a legal dictionary.
>
> ~Richard.
>
>
> Richard Wallis
> Founder, Data Liberate
> http://dataliberate.com
> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
> Twitter: @rjw
>
> On 13 January 2016 at 02:59, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Erin !
>>
>> Let me also CC in the Schema.org mailing list to get you some grounding
>> on things (and have others help out here as well).
>>
>> That's great news that you have at least heard about it and thinking of
>> using Schema.org with Wordnik.com.
>>
>> Wordnik.com (now a non-profit) could use some Schema.org love....ideally
>> you would use JSON-LD.  (I used Wordnik's API in the past, very cool.)
>>
>> Reference Schema.org mailing list thread discussing online dictionaries
>> last year, to begin everyone's journey:
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2015Apr/0028.html
>>
>> The basics I could think of for Wordnik would be uses or extension points
>> at:
>> https://schema.org/Thing
>> https://schema.org/Language ??
>>
>> Where Thing - name is any "word" in a language, and to start we would
>> just need to add an additional Type such as
>>
>> http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/LexicalItem <-- The most
>> fitting form for Wordnik I would think and other online dictionaries ?
>>
>> Other helpful additional Types would be:
>>
>> http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/SyntacticWord
>> http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/OrthographicWord
>> http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/Term
>> http://linguistics-ontology.org/gold/2010/LexicalizedConcept
>>
>> That's my starting help for you, I'll leave others on the list to chime
>> in and take it from there.  I don't think a Schema.org extension for this
>> is necessarily warranted, but it might be useful to create one, just to
>> understand and merge those useful/needed GOLD concepts to Schema.org
>> types/properties ... and in doing so, help other online dictionary vendors,
>> such as Wordnik, etc.
>>
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> Thad
>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Erin McKean <erin@wordnik.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks so much! I've been keeping an eye on schema.org, but I haven't
>>> dug deep enough to see what the right markup for Wordnik would be. It looks
>>> like this StackOverflow post has some details (
>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11698336/schema-org-and-an-online-dictionary)
>>> but any suggestions would be gratefully received!
>>>
>>> Yours,
>>>
>>> Erin
>>> ---------------------
>>> Erin McKean
>>> Wordnik
>>> @emckean/@wordnik/@wordnikapi
>>> the Wordnik mission: every English word, available to everyone,
>>> everywhere
>>>
>>> PS we're happy to send you some stickers -- just let us know where to
>>> address the envelope!
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/12/16 12:02 PM, Thad Guidry wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Get Schema.org JSON-LD scripts into those public Wordnik pages so you
>>>> can benefit from searchability !
>>>>
>>>> Thad
>>>> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Friday, 15 January 2016 13:16:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 15 January 2016 13:16:36 UTC