W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > April 2016

Re: PhysicalActivity, ExercisePlan

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 21:57:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CAK-qy=63oh95YUdpqfVe354p8BBm6omfPuop-woART6VvfHAiw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>, Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
Cc: Marc Twagirumukiza <marc.twagirumukiza@agfa.com>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
On 21 April 2016 at 21:49, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
> So Dan, you or Richard will work on a bit of Python to catch this sorta
> thing in extensions in the future, right ?

Heh, I'd like to say "just contribute a new SPARQL-based test case,
Thad!" but there are some subtleties that probably need investigating

is a collection of tests that work reasonably well against the core,
and catch some similar issues. But yes we need to get this updated for
the more complex environment we're in now with extensions, possibly
using named graphs etc etc (the site is implemented using triples +
contextual layer corresponding to a named extension, since you ask).
Feel free to take a look though, maybe a pretty simple query would
still catch some possible mistakes. For e.g. you could look for pairs
of types ?c1 and ?c2 where ?c1 is subClassOf a broader type ?c2 and
?c1 isPartOf the core and ?c2 isn't. I'm not sure if we're loading all
the extension data into the unit test environment yet though. Richard?


> Thad
> +ThadGuidry
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2016 20:57:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:12:24 UTC