W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > April 2016

Re: Review schema for books and short stories.

From: Alex McKee <alex@agmckee.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 11:26:20 +0100
To: public-schemaorg@w3.org
Message-ID: <5707874C.6050500@agmckee.co.uk>

Bear in mind that older books often do not have an ISBN. Anything 
published before the mid 1960s will have no ISBN. So I strongly oppose 
making ISBN required.

Alex McKee

On 05/04/2016 04:26, Ali Kayn wrote:
> I do reviews.  For a collection I still use 'author' for the editor, 
> as a broader interpretation of the word.
> I absolutely support requiring an ISBN for books.  Books and Magazines 
> (ISSN) are specific object that are required to be archived  by state 
> and national libraries.
> SameAs can be a bit harder to track down.  Sometimes books and stories 
> are listed on author sites, sometimes they are listed on Amazon or 
> Wikipedia.
> Reviewing short stories within collections looks like something not 
> yet considered.  If you do stories within a collection or a magazine, 
> can you use itemlist?
> ALi Kayn
> Editor and Publisher
> Festivale Online Magazine
> http://festivale.info
> http://reel-life.info
> https://facebook.com/FestivaleOnline
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/ali-kayn-9a608b45
> twitter:  @ali_festivale
> GPO Box 1510
> Australia
Received on Sunday, 10 April 2016 20:55:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:12:24 UTC