- From: Alex McKee <alex@agmckee.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 11:26:20 +0100
- To: public-schemaorg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5707874C.6050500@agmckee.co.uk>
Ali, Bear in mind that older books often do not have an ISBN. Anything published before the mid 1960s will have no ISBN. So I strongly oppose making ISBN required. Alex McKee On 05/04/2016 04:26, Ali Kayn wrote: > I do reviews. For a collection I still use 'author' for the editor, > as a broader interpretation of the word. > I absolutely support requiring an ISBN for books. Books and Magazines > (ISSN) are specific object that are required to be archived by state > and national libraries. > SameAs can be a bit harder to track down. Sometimes books and stories > are listed on author sites, sometimes they are listed on Amazon or > Wikipedia. > Reviewing short stories within collections looks like something not > yet considered. If you do stories within a collection or a magazine, > can you use itemlist? > ALi Kayn > Editor and Publisher > Festivale Online Magazine > http://festivale.info > http://reel-life.info > https://facebook.com/FestivaleOnline > https://www.linkedin.com/in/ali-kayn-9a608b45 > twitter: @ali_festivale > GPO Box 1510 > MELBOURNE GPO VIC 3001 > Australia
Received on Sunday, 10 April 2016 20:55:57 UTC