- From: Dan Guo <dguo1113@stanford.edu>
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 19:11:11 -0700
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: "schema. org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHDutDFQ9ffeup5q3FQYVbpuewMQMgMnUh8xDGekD0inHsOQiw@mail.gmail.com>
Hey Dan, Thanks for the responses. As a followup, I am curious if there is any search support by Google or others for http://health-lifesci.webschemas.org/ in JSON-LD format. It seems as if the data supported in JSON-LD are a limited few from this link <https://developers.google.com/structured-data/schema-org>. Is that the intended purpose, to allow for this health-lifesci schema to be used mostly in microdata or RDFa format? For example, if I were to use a webpage that had such a JSON-LD blob, following this tutorial <https://developers.google.com/custom-search/docs/structured_data#using-pagemaps> and using Control Panel, the custom searches only surface the texts of the HTML file, not the hidden JSON-LD packet. Any insights into this issue would be much appreciated! Thanks, Dan Guo On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:12 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > In this case I think the matter is much less one of convincing our > Steering Group (see http://schema.org/docs/about.html) and much more > about the wider community reviewing it for its technical implementation, > spelling/typos and overlap / integration with the rest of schema.org. The > bulk of the terminology is already in schema.org (might even be 20%+ of > the classes) but by moving it to a topical extension we can evolve it > further without it dominating People's core experience of schema.org. > > I think it likely we'll finalise it in near future - i.e. counted in > days/weeks rather than months/years. But do please take a look for errors > etc if you have time. > > Hope that helps, > > Dan > On 1 Apr 2016 11:43, "Dan Guo" <dguo1113@stanford.edu> wrote: > >> To whom it may concern, >> I am taking a look at the http://health-lifesci.webschemas.org/ schema, >> which seems quite powerful and it appears to be in development. >> >> I am curious what the timeline is for this schema to get approved for >> sponsorship by groups like Google, Yahoo!, etc.? As well, I am curious what >> can be done with schemas that are only in development. >> >> Thanks for the support! >> Cheers, >> Dan Guo >> >
Received on Saturday, 2 April 2016 02:21:56 UTC