W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > April 2016

Re: Question about Schema Development Timeline

From: Dan Guo <dguo1113@stanford.edu>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 19:11:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHDutDFQ9ffeup5q3FQYVbpuewMQMgMnUh8xDGekD0inHsOQiw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Cc: "schema. org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
Hey Dan,
Thanks for the responses.
As a followup, I am curious if there is any search support by Google or
others for http://health-lifesci.webschemas.org/  in JSON-LD format.
It seems as if the data supported in JSON-LD are a limited few from this
link <https://developers.google.com/structured-data/schema-org>.

Is that the intended purpose, to allow for this health-lifesci schema to be
used mostly in microdata or RDFa format? For example, if I were to use a
webpage that had such a JSON-LD blob, following this tutorial
<https://developers.google.com/custom-search/docs/structured_data#using-pagemaps>
and using Control Panel, the custom searches only surface the texts of the
HTML file, not the hidden JSON-LD packet.

Any insights into this issue would be much appreciated!

Thanks,
Dan Guo

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:12 AM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:

> Hi Dan,
>
> In this case I think the matter is much less one of convincing our
> Steering Group (see http://schema.org/docs/about.html) and much more
> about the wider community reviewing it for its technical implementation,
> spelling/typos and overlap / integration with the rest of schema.org. The
> bulk of the terminology is already in schema.org (might even be 20%+ of
> the classes) but by moving it to a topical extension we can evolve it
> further without it dominating People's core experience of schema.org.
>
> I think it likely we'll finalise it in near future - i.e. counted in
> days/weeks rather than months/years. But do please take a look for errors
> etc if you have time.
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Dan
> On 1 Apr 2016 11:43, "Dan Guo" <dguo1113@stanford.edu> wrote:
>
>> To whom it may concern,
>> I am taking a look at the http://health-lifesci.webschemas.org/ schema,
>> which seems quite powerful and it appears to be in development.
>>
>> I am curious what the timeline is for this schema to get approved for
>> sponsorship by groups like Google, Yahoo!, etc.? As well, I am curious what
>> can be done with schemas that are only in development.
>>
>> Thanks for the support!
>> Cheers,
>> Dan Guo
>>
>
Received on Saturday, 2 April 2016 02:21:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:12:24 UTC