- From: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 19:12:35 +0100
- To: Jacob Jett <jjett2@illinois.edu>
- Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAD47Kz7hY8DnMzstJohAaYsm-xQwKLcjRGLw5z_+Ox2m8KWd3g@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jacob, I will answer question 2. first. All properties in the Schema.org vocabulary are optional an optionally repeatable. isbn, is a well recognised property for books, especially in a commercial environment, and hence has been part of the vocabulary from the beginning and well before a bibliographic focus has been applied to its enhancement. The topic of generic identifier patterns were discussed <https://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Identifier> in the Schema Bib Extend W3C Community Group <https://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/>, which has ben responsible for many bibliographic enhancement/extension proposals for schema.org, and more recently the bib.schema.org extension <http://bib.schema.org>. After discussion the approach was not recommended. In practice LCC, Dewey number, and other identifiers are handled by referencing the subject, author, classification entity they identify, and are therefore not direct properties of the CreativeWork [Book] being described. The about property is usually used to relate the CreativeWork to these. Checkout the 'Linked Data' tab on this page <http://www.worldcat.org/title/zen-and-the-art-of-motorcycle-maintenance-an-inquiry-into-values/oclc/673595&referer=brief_results>, and any other result, from OCLC's WorldCat for an example of this. You may find OCLC's work, publishing [using schema.org] 300+ Million bibliographic resource descriptions linked to related work descriptions in this are helpful in your analysis. ~Richard. Richard Wallis Founder, Data Liberate http://dataliberate.com Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis Twitter: @rjw On 8 October 2015 at 18:29, Jacob Jett <jjett2@illinois.edu> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm a researcher examining the plausibility of walking library MARC format > metadata into the schema.org ontology. I see that one of the properties > of schema:Book is schema:isbn. I had two questions. > > 1) Is there a generic property that allows me to assert additional > identifiers, such as classification numbers (e.g. LCC number)? > > 2) Is the model's expectation that all books have ISBNs? Because that > simply isn't true. At best ISBN is a contingent property of books (some > have them and some do not, especially as you track back in time). Does this > mean that schema:isbn is an optional property for schema:Book(s)? Doesn't > it make more sense to just have a more generalized property that works with > any standardized numbering scheme? > > For example > > schema:Book schema-ex:identifier schema-ex:Identifier . > > schema-ex:Identifier schema-ex:identifierType schema-ex:IdentifierStandard > . > > And then have a similar set of properties for standardized classification > schemes. > > Thanks, > > Jacob > > _____________________________________________________ > Jacob Jett > Research Assistant > Center for Informatics Research in Science and Scholarship > The Graduate School of Library and Information Science > University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign > 501 E. Daniel Street, MC-493, Champaign, IL 61820-6211 USA > (217) 244-2164 > jjett2@illinois.edu > >
Received on Thursday, 8 October 2015 18:13:09 UTC