Hi,
I support Richard's proposal to create a community group.
From my point of view within the tourism industry, I think the field is
wide and complex enough to merit a separate group to discuss about its
own vocabulary. Having a easy-to-identify place to agree on these
matters could bring in actors involved in the tourism industry (hotels,
managers of national country tourism organizations, etc) whose support
would be key to make the vocabulary gain traction.
Although having a separate github repository might work from a technical
standpoint, I feel this would amount to watering down the group and
could put-off some non-technical people interested in the subject.
Felipe
> Thad Guidry <mailto:thadguidry@gmail.com>
> 19 November 2015 at 17:20
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org
> <mailto:jeff@w3.org>> wrote:
>
> In the Web Incubation Community Group the plan is for each
> proposed specification that might go into the "Web Platform WG",
> they open a separate github repository - but it still operates in
> the single WICG.
>
> Would it equally work here, to just set up a different github
> repository for tourism?
>
>
> I would say do what makes DanBri and Richard's tasks more efficient in
> the long term. Ultimately, they have to maintain it with the Community.
>
> Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
>
> Jeff Jaffe <mailto:jeff@w3.org>
> 19 November 2015 at 16:58
> In the Web Incubation Community Group the plan is for each proposed
> specification that might go into the "Web Platform WG", they open a
> separate github repository - but it still operates in the single WICG.
>
> Would it equally work here, to just set up a different github
> repository for tourism?
>
> Jeff
>
> On 11/19/2015 10:53 AM, Shane McCarron wrote:
>
> Shane McCarron <mailto:shane@aptest.com>
> 19 November 2015 at 16:53
> Many groups end up creating a "task force" for things like this.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Shane McCarron
> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
> Sergio Fernández <mailto:sergio.fernandez@redlink.co>
> 19 November 2015 at 16:50
> I'm also interested in more tourism capabilities in schema.org
> <http://schema.org>, that the reason for features like event series
> https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/pull/446
>
> But my big -1 to create a sub CG, I don't see the benefit....
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sergio Fernández
> Partner Technology Manager
> Redlink GmbH
> m: +43 6602747925
> e: sergio.fernandez@redlink.co <mailto:sergio.fernandez@redlink.co>
> w: http://redlink.co
> Fred LAURENT <mailto:fred_laurent@hotmail.com>
> 19 November 2015 at 16:21
> Hi Richard,
>
> I'd like to support this group. There are so many possible "tourism
> products" (at least in France) that it seems a dedicated group should
> help.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> *Fred LAURENT
> */
> /
>
> /Semantic Markup made easy/
> Tel: +33 (0)6 17 99 32 21
> Quartier Le Claret - 06510 Carros
> fred@semanticmarker.com <mailto:fred@semanticmarker.com> |
> semanticmarker.com <http://semanticmarker..com/>
>
>
>
--
Felipe Santi
CTO
SISMOTUR
2 rue Louis Revon
74000 Annecy (France)
+33 619 20 30 61
www.sismotur.com