Re: Tourism Schema

I fully agree with Martin on this. With my little experience, It seems just
having work done with GiHub code repository is enough.

On 19 November 2015 at 16:10, Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am actually not too much a fan of founding a new W3C CG for every new
> branch of schema.org. In the end, running a CG is a considerable overhead
> with no clear added value.
>
> Martin
>
> -----------------------------------
> martin hepp  http://www.heppnetz.de
> mhepp@computer.org          @mfhepp
>
>
>
>
> > On 19 Nov 2015, at 16:07, Richard Wallis <
> richard.wallis@dataliberate.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sounds to me like there could be enough interest here to create a
> community group for discussion of possible proposals to Schema, even a
> potential tourism.schema.org extension if that was felt appropriate.
> Forming such a group would have the benefit of being able to invite/attract
> other like minded people  to test tourism use cases and support proposals
> made.
> >
> > We need 5+ people to support such a group.
> >
> > If we get that many +1’s to this message I’ll volunteer to set the
> wheels in motion.
> >
> > ~Richard.
> >
> > Richard Wallis
> > Founder, Data Liberate
> > http://dataliberate.com
> > Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis
> > Twitter: @rjw
> >
> > On 18 November 2015 at 09:00, Marti Cuquet <marti.cuquet@sti2.at> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to join and support this group as well.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Marti
> >
> > --
> > Dr. Marti Cuquet
> > Tel: +43 512 507 53722
> > Semantic Technology Institute
> > University of Innsbruck
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>