- From: Kevin Polley <kevin.polley@mutualadvantage.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 15:08:59 -0000
- To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: "Stuart Robinson" <stuartro@google.com>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
+1 for a more general approach which would be more globally applicable. This, in part, was briefly discussed and there was a proposal to add LegalService under ProfessionalService (still to be implemented) due to the influence of http://schema.org/Attorney which is not that useful in the UK/EU ref: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2014Mar/0113.html Kevin Polley > > This sounds worthwhile to me. The painful decision of course is the > one you highlight: whether to do something detailed/accurate but US > specific, or try to make the definitions general (vague?) enough to > cover other jurisdictions too. > > I've fwd'd this to a few (mostly European) contacts who might be > interested, if they are I'll encourage them to collaborate here and > GitHub. It would probably help if we could throw together a quick > test build of the site that had a draft vocabulary + examples > implemented, to encourage discussion from people who aren't following > schema.org super closely... > > cheers, > > Dan > > >> Thanks, >> Stuart Robinson >> >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 22 May 2015 15:09:30 UTC