W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemaorg@w3.org > June 2015

Re: description of courses with LRMI / schema.org

From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 12:04:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CAChbWaMenHP9nmPkW_fW5xqaNW11uAVYgJE6Cw7mkc2oYp+N=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk>
Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
I added my comment to 1.4 section Provenance -  My concern is use cases
regarding Transferability.  Details in my comment.

Sometimes a learner would like to know if a particular course is
transferable to another State university or system.  Typically, the State
system will have an identifier for the course (its transferable course
code).  For example, Texas system has a code ARTF 1301 (which means 2D
Design).  Many of the Universities in the Texas system teach this similar
course, all with their own codes, but also designating that their course is
transferable against the State code, I.E. kinda of like a sameAs reference
if you will.

In a nutshell:
"Their course, ARTF 1311, is similar to our course, ART 133, and both have
the same State transfer code of ARTF 1301 and credit at either one would be
transferable within the State system, or sometimes perhaps a Regional
system, etc"


Thad
+ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk> wrote:

>
> With apologies for cross posting. If you are interested in the use of
> schema.org for educational / learning resources, then please do take a
> look at the LRMI group: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/lrmi
>
> Phil
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------  Subject: description of courses with
> LRMI / schema.org  Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:58:25 +0100  From: Phil
> Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk> <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk>  Reply-To:
> lrmi@googlegroups.com  To: lrmi@googlegroups.com <lrmi@googlegroups.com>
> <lrmi@googlegroups.com>
>
> Hello all,
> as you may know the idea of using LRMI / schema.org for describing
> courses has been mooted several times over the last two or three years,
> here and on the main schema.org mail lists. Most recently, Wes Turner
> opened an issue on github which attracted some attention [1] and some
> proposed solutions.
>
> I lead a work package within the DCMI LRMI Task Group [2] to try to take
> this forwards. To that end I and some colleagues in the Task Group have
> given some thought to what the scope and use cases to be addressed might
> be. You can see our notes as a Google Doc <https://goo.gl/CO6vKc> <https://goo.gl/CO6vKc>, you
> should be able to add comments to this document and we would welcome
> your thoughts. In particular we would like to know whether there are any
> missing use cases or requirements. Other offers of help and ideas would
> also be welcome!
>
> I plan to compare the derived requirements with the proposed solutions
> and with the data typically provided in web pages.
>
> Best regards, Phil Barker
>
>
> 1. https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/195
> 2. http://wiki.dublincore.org/index.php/AB-Comm/ed/LRMI/TG
>
>
> --
> --
> Phil Barker           @philbarker
> LRMI, Cetis, ICBL     http://people.pjjk.net/phil
> Heriot-Watt University
>
> Ubuntu: http://xkcd.com/456/
>   not so much an operating system as a learning opportunity.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Learning Resource Metadata Initiative" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lrmi+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2015 17:05:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 30 June 2015 17:05:17 UTC