- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 19:00:26 -0700
- To: "mfhepp@gmail.com" <mfhepp@gmail.com>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
The Linter now detects JSON errors as well as most HTML markup errors, which handles another class of previously silently failing use cases.
A future update should probably do some UI improvements to better warn when issues are found, so you don’t simply need to look down at Linter Messages.
Gregg Kellogg
gregg@greggkellogg.net
> On Jun 9, 2015, at 1:59 AM, mfhepp@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Dear Gregg,
> dear Manu:
>
> I think there is a need for clarifying the proper use of multiple values for the same property in JSON-LD because if I understand it properly, the behavior differs from any other RDF syntax and Microdata (see [1]), as you CANNOT simply repeat a property with different values, as in any other RDF syntax, like so
>
>
> <script type="application/ld+json">
> {
> "@context": "http://schema.org",
> "@type": "Offer",
> "businessFunction" : "http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#Repair",
> "businessFunction" : "http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#Sell"
>
> }
> </script>
>
> but instead must use a LIST of values, like so:
>
>
> <script type="application/ld+json">
> {
> "@context": "http://schema.org",
> "@type": "Offer",
> "businessFunction": ["http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#Repair", "http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#Sell" ]
>
> }
> </script>
>
> The Google Structured Data Testing Tool shows only the value for the last use of the same property name, but in complex data structures, this will be easy to overlook.
>
> We should highlight this prominently (and review all of our examples in schema.org), because otherwise people will have a hard time understanding why only part of their data is understood.
>
> In particular, product feature markup with many usages of "additionalProperty" will be prone to this.
>
> Best
>
> Martin
>
> [1] http://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/81080/using-productontology-org-to-add-multiple-types/81081#81081
>
>
> -----------------------------------
> martin hepp http://www.heppnetz.de
> mhepp@computer.org @mfhepp
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 02:01:04 UTC