- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:48:12 +0200
- To: Jindřich Mynarz <mynarzjindrich@gmail.com>
- CC: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>, Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@unibw.de>
On 07/20/2015 09:04 AM, Jindřich Mynarz wrote: > If you want to link from the offer to the items included in the offer, >> there is schema:itemOffered for a single product (same as gr:includes) and >> schema:includesObject for a bundle. CreativeWork >> <http://schema.org/CreativeWork> and Event <http://schema.org/Event> are >> just two types that are actually specializations of schema:Product, but >> since we do not want to put every type that could also be used in offers >> below schema:Product, they are listed explicitly in the range/domain. >> > > I know. My question was only about the confusing local name of the > schema:offers property. In particular, it is confusing for people like me > who got used to gr:offers before there was Schema.org. In fact, I might > have used schema:offers as schema:Organization=>schema:offers=>schema:Offer > in several cases, blindly relying on the GoodRelations to Schema.org > mapping. Hi, I didn't notice http://schema.org/makesOffer mentioned on his thread, which looks like property one should use instead of schema:offer in cases like above. I suggested capturing various details about GoodRelations related parts of schema.org using github wiki https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/wiki/Schema.org-Goods I also remember Martin mentioning couple of times that he works on in depth page on that topic. I would sill see using public wiki (+ dedicated issue for talk) helpful to collaborate and 'release early, release often' :) Cheers!
Received on Monday, 20 July 2015 10:48:38 UTC