Re: Proposal: series of "Advanced Use" articles

Am 10. April 2015 19:46:03 MESZ, schrieb Paul Watson <lazarus@lazaruscorporation.co.uk>:
>On 10/04/15 18:12, Dan Brickley wrote:
>> On 10 April 2015 at 17:45, Paul Watson
><lazarus@lazaruscorporation.co.uk> wrote:
>>> I'm glad that proposal received such a positive response!
>>>
>>> Just thinking about the mechanics of it, since the content of the
>main
>>> schema.org domain needs to be deployed from github, it may be easier
>to set
>>> up a new subdomain (http://tutorials.schema.org?), add a CMS
>(Drupal?), and
>>> then control the publishing of tutorials through the CMS rather than
>having
>>> them dependent on release deployments to the main schema.org domain.
>Any
>>> existing tutorials linked from http://schema.org/docs/documents.html
>could
>>> be re-keyed into the CMS on the subdomain, and 301 redirects set up.
>> Thanks for starting this discussion! I'd suggest that W3C's Community
>> Group machinery, which is built on top of Wordpress, ought to be a
>> reasonable place to start, with simple links from
>/docs/documents.html
>> being a reasonable start.
>>
>> If you log into https://www.w3.org/community/schemaorg/ with your w3c
>> account info you should see (from the discreet menu bar at top of
>> page) that it is all based on Wordpress, so there is a button there
>> for 'new post', 'new page'. Let's collect questions/topics in Github
>> as issues and to the extent that there is actually any consensus on
>> the answers, that should provide raw materials for getting written
>up.
>Wordpress is fine by me if it's already set up and ready to use.
>>
>> So what topics do folk here think deserve coverage, beyond the basic
>> 'getting started' guides that already exist?
>>
>> Dan
>
>Apart from Martin's proposed tutorial/article on the Goodrelations
>model 
>in schema.org (which I look forward to) and some of Dan Scott's
>articles 
>(which I read earlier and were very good), I agree with Aaron that the 
>use of itemref in the schema.org <http://schema.org> context would be a
>
>great subject for a tutorial.
>
>Plus anything to do with Linked Data in schema.org and the use of 
>multiple schema.org types on a single "item" (I think one of Dan
>Scott's 
>articles did explain attack this one)
>
>And when the proposed schema.org extension mechanism is published then 
>that would certainly be a subject for a number of tutorials.
>
>Another source of possible articles would be to browse through the 
>StackOverflow questions about schema.org at 
>http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/?tagnames=schema.org&sort=newest
>
>and look for any common questions.
>
>Finally, I think we should try to provide examples in all 3 formats 
>(Microdata, RDFa, and JSON-LD)

Can we remove Microdata or move it to the end? I think Turtle would be more helpful...

Cheers,
Andreas

Received on Friday, 10 April 2015 17:57:38 UTC