- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:43:12 +0100
- To: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
- Cc: "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
Thanks for this. Can you offer any insight into how this approach compares/contrasts to whatever's going on in the Bibframe world? Do they have similar short lists of work types? Dan On 29 November 2016 at 13:14, Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Just a heads-up that I have proposed minor enhancements to the > bib.schema.org extension to Schema.org. > > It is for 4 new subtypes of CreativeWork (Manuscript, Poster, Drawing, > SheetMusic), plus adding the publisher property to the PublicationEvent > Type. > > This has come out of personal practical experience with a few > national/international library organisations towards applying Schema.org to > their catalogues. > > The proposal can be found in GitHub issue (#1448) > > As I say in the proposal “Like others, I am reticent to propose/recommend > ever increasing numbers of subtypes to allow categorisation of a particular > domain. However in this case, I believe we are close to covering the vast > majority of types that this domain commonly describes. I therefore propose > the above to attempt to bring this extension closer to completion." > > > ~Richard. > Richard Wallis > Founder, Data Liberate > http://dataliberate.com > Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis > Twitter: @rjw
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2016 13:43:46 UTC