RE: SchemaBibEx and bib.schema.org

+1 for biblio.

I would also like to participate in developing this vocabulary; especially on how to use this new extension using Fedora 4 as a linked data platform.

Jeremy Nelson
Metadata and Systems Librarian
Colorado College

From: Dan Scott [mailto:denials@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 2:35 PM
To: Thad Guidry; Wallis,Richard
Cc: public-schemabibex@w3.org
Subject: Re: SchemaBibEx and bib.schema.org

Hi Richard:

I would certainly be willing to participate in developing a bib.schema.org<http://bib.schema.org> corner of the universe (hopefully one not soon to be forgotten by the rest of the universe!)

But when you say "BiblioGraph.net [...] that vocabulary acting a seed for a bib.schema.org<http://bib.schema.org> extension which would eventually replace the current need for it", are you proposing that we start by adopting all of the current bibliograph.net<http://bibliograph.net> extensions wholesale? I'm kind of hoping not :)

Also, per Thad's suggestion, biblio.schema.org<http://biblio.schema.org> sounds fine to me too. No getting mistaken with a vocabulary for baby's drool-catchers.

Thanks,
Dan

On Mon, 9 Mar 2015 at 14:28 Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com<mailto:thadguidry@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Richard,

I would prefer a bit more length() on the domain name:

biblio.schema.org<http://biblio.schema.org>

otherwise +1

Thad
+ThadGuidry<https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>