- From: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:21:58 -0600
- To: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
- Cc: "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 20 February 2014 15:22:26 UTC
I do have 1 thought. Towards the wider scope of GLAM, in general. Specifically, I am wondering if the Schemabibex Group has/is interested in trying to assist with another bib focus for Art (items in a collection). My question is... are all the pieces in place for describing bibliographic resources towards those items in a collection of Art ? Or does the Schemaibibex Group think that other groups have more leverage and should let them handle work on that ? Curious, -- -Thad +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
Received on Thursday, 20 February 2014 15:22:26 UTC